But here's what you don't realize and misunderstand about Smash Bros. It is indeed supposed to be a tribute to Nintendo. However, third-parties have played a VITAl role in Nintendo's history. They don't tarnish Nintendo's name or are just "amusing little novelties". They are series that even hardcore Nintendo fans such as I even love. Yeah, I can somewhat agree that having like, around ten series of third-parties would be overkill and mainly shift focus away from Nintendo mainly. It is just that that these series have provide many fans with find memories of Nintendo in general and are widely known.
Smash Bros. might have not even gotten as famous if it wasn't for Snake being introduced one E3 afternoon to increase overall hype. You thick this game was just made for hardcore Nintendo fans, and this is true. But saying that third-parties don't count in for Nintendo's history is completely false. This game wasn't made just for you, it was made for Nintendo fans as a whole. If you like only Nintendo franchises, that's fine, but don't get twisted because someone else's favorite series got in because it wasn't made specifically by Nintendo. There's a word I use for that, and it is immature. Characters like Sonic and Snake have just as much of a right to be in a fighter dedicated to Nintendo's history as any other Nintendo series if they can cause so many fans to be happy. Lastly, that's what makes them matter, it makes fans happy while catering to main Nintendo fans at the same time.
So don't get so righteous as if you have to declare how to correctly celebrate Nintendo's history, because you obviously can't. I'm not going to argue anymore because I don't want to derail this subject into even more threads. But please, do us all a favor and get off of your high horse while respecting everyone else's opinions, despite how different your's may be.