Who are you voting for (or would vote for if you could)?

Best candidate?

  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 20 48.8%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 6 14.6%
  • Gary Johnson

    Votes: 9 22.0%
  • None of them

    Votes: 6 14.6%

  • Total voters
    41
I can't believe I actually chose Hillary in the poll.


These two articles are very interesting insights into Trump and Sanders' campaigns, supporters, and more:

http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/2016/how-sanders-happened/
http://graphics.wsj.com/elections/2016/how-trump-happened/
 
Bernie still has a slight chance. I have faith in him.

Also, Vote Larry Koopa for President 2016
 
Larry Koopa isn't 35 so he can't run for president in the first place
 
Oh yeah iced tea and lemonade is good.

Back on topic, I knew I'd be moving to Canada because Trump would win the nomination.
 
DragonFreak said:
But do we really want another Clinton as president either?
she's not the best choice either, but she's definitely better than having a republican in the white house. also I seriously doubt she'll single handedly destroy the U.S.
 
Charley Dietz said:
Oh yeah iced tea and lemonade is good.

Back on topic, I knew I'd be moving to Canada because Trump would win the nomination.

Trump has trouble winning delegates, though. I don't think he can win against Hilary.
 
So my mom thinks this election might make history in that an independent or third-party might win because someone might say "Nobody likes any of these people, vote for me instead."
 
bernie sanders can't even beat clinton, what makes you think a third party will?
 
There will only really be the two parties. Too many people are already supporting the Democrats and the Republicans. You'd probably have a better chance of winning the lottery than having a third party get in.
 
Nozomi Toujou said:
PrinceLarryKoopa88 said:
Nozomi Toujou said:
PrinceLarryKoopa88 said:
Also, Vote Larry Koopa for President 2016
This is serious.
Not really.
There are people fearing for their lives if certain people get elected, but sure.
Yes. But the corruption is getting larger especially in thr election process. Big money should not be involved in politics. These 1% are playing games with this ****!

General Neptune said:
There will only really be the two parties. Too many people are already supporting the Democrats and the Republicans. You'd probably have a better chance of winning the lottery than having a third party get in.
I think we should get rid of political parties. All they do is distract everyone with drama, while they go fight on revenge. The parties don't represent the people. The parties represent the parties and they act on the vengeance against the other party not on the needs of their people. UNNECESSARY DRAMA!
 
Are you still serious or...?

I don't like Super PACs and stuff funding our politics, but who's going to stop that, honestly?
 
I'm mixed with both Trump and Clinton but I would be more likely to vote for Clinton because it is Trump's vice presidential candidate could be Chris Christie who has been running New Jersey pretty badly lately. Sanders would be running America like if it is the united
Socialist States of America with his ideas with the lower class and free college tuitions.

And on a side note, why is Ted Cruz not included on this poll?
 
This article mentions the possibility of Sanders becoming Hillary's Vice President/Running Mate

If Sanders truly can't win the nomination, then him being vice president to Hillary I think could soften the blow. Because for whatever differences Sanders and Clinton have, they can certainly try to talk it over with one another. Either way it would probably be the best chance for the Democrats to unite against Trump if there really is no stopping Hillary from winning the nomination.
 
Northern Verve said:
This article mentions the possibility of Sanders becoming Hillary's Vice President/Running Mate

If Sanders truly can't win the nomination, then him being vice president to Hillary I think could soften the blow. Because for whatever differences Sanders and Clinton have, they can certainly try to talk it over with one another. Either way it would probably be the best chance for the Democrats to unite against Trump if there really is no stopping Hillary from winning the nomination.
That might be a bad idea. There are people commited to the Bernie or Bust movement. If Sanders VP with Hillary, it might backlash into him being called a sellout, resulting in a chunk of the Democratic voter base to not participate or find another option. However, if Bernie loses the nomination without taking the VP offer, that same chunk of voters will move on to form a more progressive group, do nothing, or find a third option.

Anyways, both parties are doomed. The GOPs name is engraved with the Trump movement which is to many, a negative connotation, and the DPs on the verge of splitting over its own nomination. Either way, Trump's going to win if the DP doesn't straighten out its **** soon.
 
Banjo said:
Peri said:
Cruz is more conservative ergo he's worse imo

thats a very black and white approach to things
eh, that's just how I think. like, I disagree with conservatives on basically everything except economic issues, and even then I tend to lean more left. but I totally understand people not agreeing with that kind/line of thought
 
download44.jpeg

I'm not from the United States and I'm underage, but if I could vote, I'd be like 46% of Clinton supporters (Bernie has unfortunately no chance of winning imo)
 
Zant said:
Sanders would be running America like if it is the united Socialist States of America with his ideas with the lower class and free college tuitions.

you sound like free college tuition are a bad thing

also, you're only saying "socialist" because it's the hip and trendy buzzword that conservatives use that they actually don't know the meaning of
 
Back