What gamers do you hate?

Just because someone spends months creating something doesn't mean it won't suck.
Just because you write comments doesn't mean you are right. Months are more than a week of "OMG THIS IS THE WORST THING "CURSE ASS JOKE!", more to say than any stupid *bleep*ty internet reviewer that has ever lived, that movie "The Room" is good compared to those *bleep*s. So yeah, they suck, beat it :posh:
 
Altair said:
Just because someone spends months creating something doesn't mean it won't suck.
Just because you write comments doesn't mean you are right. Months are more than a week of "OMG THIS IS THE WORST THING "CURSE ASS JOKE!", more to say than any stupid *bleep*ty internet reviewer that has ever lived, that movie "The Room" is good compared to those *bleep*s. So yeah, they suck, beat it :posh:
...what are you trying to say here?
 
That he doesn't think comedy reviewers should get payed for doing their job.

The game creators don't make the jokes or the editing, that's all for the youtuber to do and it can easily fail if their jokes fall flat.

But they have so many subscribers because their jokes are consistently funny for the subscribers, hence why they subscribe, watch, and continue coming back for more. Comedy is just really uplifting most of the time, a good laugh can give you a slight reprieve from all your problems.
 
I like it when reviewers actually review the game, instead of cracking jokes
comedy reviews can be funny, but I think they shouldn't be recognized as reviews
 
Michell said:
I like it when reviewers actually review the game, instead of cracking jokes
comedy reviews can be funny, but I think they shouldn't be recognized as reviews
So for example, you wouldn't consider Gene Shalit a reviewer (or as they're more commonly called, critic).

If you don't know who Shalit is, he's a movie critic whose reviews were peppered and salted with puns.
 
Michell said:
I like it when reviewers actually review the game, instead of cracking jokes
comedy reviews can be funny, but I think they shouldn't be recognized as reviews
You can do both.

Joshscorcher reviews MLP episodes, and both cracks jokes and makes commentary on good/bad things in the episode.
 
true, and true

but its rare to find someone who does both well consistently

IE everything wrong with "___" in "___" is hilarious, but not an accurate movie review
same goes for honest trailers

while both may address plot holes and other such major concerns they aren't really reviews
 
Michell said:
IE everything wrong with "___" in "___" is hilarious, but not an accurate movie review
same goes for honest trailers

while both may address plot holes and other such major concerns they aren't really reviews

Well things like those aren't really meant to be reviews.
 
Altair said:
Just because someone spends months creating something doesn't mean it won't suck.
Just because you write comments doesn't mean you are right. Months are more than a week of "OMG THIS IS THE WORST THING "CURSE ASS JOKE!", more to say than any stupid *bleep*ty internet reviewer that has ever lived, that movie "The Room" is good compared to those *bleep*s. So yeah, they suck, beat it :posh:
So, implying from your little speech, you're saying that Daikatana and Duke Nukem Forever deserve praise because it took years to make?