What the flying freak is found in our food?

Yeah I know but it's still a really dumb label.

I understand heating microwave stuff "contents may be hot" but I think adding a small print saying "contains nuts" is still dumb.
 
So if a company doesn't put the "Contains: Nuts" label on a container of nuts, somebody with a nut allergy will buy the nuts, not knowing there are nuts in there; consume the nuts, still not aware they are eating nuts; and then die?

That was their own fault.
They deserve to die.
 
The Robot Masters said:
So if a company doesn't put the "Contains: Nuts" label on a container of nuts, somebody with a nut allergy will buy the nuts, not knowing there are nuts in there; consume the nuts, still not aware they are eating nuts; and then die?

That was their own fault.
They deserve to die.

what if they are blind or just have bad vision?
 
Princess Zae said:
The Robot Masters said:
So if a company doesn't put the "Contains: Nuts" label on a container of nuts, somebody with a nut allergy will buy the nuts, not knowing there are nuts in there; consume the nuts, still not aware they are eating nuts; and then die?

That was their own fault.
They deserve to die.

what if they are blind or just have bad vision?

Pretty sure blind people can't even shop in the first place without help. And I doubt they would buy something they don't know what's in there.
 
Besides, putting "Contains: Nuts" on a jar of nuts won't help in that scenario since blind people can't read.

Or are you suggesting we label food in Braille too?
 
The Robot Masters said:
Besides, putting "Contains: Nuts" on a jar of nuts won't help in that scenario since blind people can't read.

Or are you suggesting we label food in Braille too?

I don't know really, i was just asking questions.

However i dont think people deserve to die due to some reading/viewing issues though
 
Again, I doubt people would buy stuff without knowing what's in there, like, at all.
 
Princess Zae said:
The Robot Masters said:
Besides, putting "Contains: Nuts" on a jar of nuts won't help in that scenario since blind people can't read.

Or are you suggesting we label food in Braille too?

I don't know really, i was just asking questions.

However i dont think people deserve to die due to some reading/viewing issues though
Reading issues aren't the problem, though. The debate is whether or not a pack of nuts should have that small print that only states the obvious.

Here. I'll do a scenario. I have a problem reading and a nut allergy. I pick up a container. I'm not sure if they are nuts. If I was smart, I would

A. Ask someone who works there.
B. Not buy them.

A dumb person, however, would buy them without asking what they are or what's in them. Those are the people that deserve what's coming to them.
 
other scenario
customer; excuse me kind customer service rep, does this have nuts? the label is unclear because companies are lazy?
employee; derp how should I know, I don't even like working here derp

customer buys anyway, and they die, not their fault
 
Michell said:
other scenario
customer; excuse me kind customer service rep, does this have nuts? the label is unclear because companies are lazy?
employee; derp how should I know, I don't even like working here derp

customer buys anyway, and they die, not their fault
We're talking about the small print on the back.

There's still the large print on the front that says "X Brand Nuts".

And yes, it is their fault. I agree the employee should have been more helpful (perhaps the customer should have called the manager), but the customer still bought something without knowing what it was.
 
what I'm saying
what if a company says "well x brand nuts doesn't need an allergy label, so why does my product need a label?"
and they get away without having a label, and someone thinks it doesn't have nuts, and they die