Featured Articles

Baby Luigi said:
Really? Why do we have a contradictory ruleset here? I remember a proposal having a strict 2 month deadline and I remember this was in an older ruleset before the proposal was enacted because of fan votes extending the life of FA nominations.
Click to expand...
That rulseset is going, for UNFA nominations if the problems are fixed and no new ones comes up within a week the nomination fails. Maybe it's for when FA nominations are made and there too many problems to be fixed and so people just leave it idle.
 
Or fans bump it, right?

I'm not really digging the new rules right now... I think I'm still confused after that proposal, so I'm still resorting to those two fail points.
 
I think there's a warning for if something is bumped to dodge inactivity.

I think the new rule is fine, the UNFA template is a bit of an eyesore and if the problems are fixed there's no reason for it to be there anymore.
 
Yeah, that vote needs to go.

And this UhHuhAlrightDaisy person is ticking me off. I've tried to clean up the description page by toning down the excess of images, but he readded most of them. I've seen his editing habits regarding the Daisy article (direct quote: "Man, people are really ripping this article to shreds. I don't even.").

I am not pleased.
 
So can we just veto the vote, because this nomination has been going on forever without any real changes being made?
 
Dear god, there are people I think who are just trying to obstruct the nomination
 
Pauline has been nominated to be featured.

It was nominated in March 26, actually, but it didn't garner plenty of attention. Anyway, the article is looking pretty good; MarioWiki's equivalent to at least a silver article, I guess. I did some touch ups such as changing tense forms and removing loaded words, although I think the Saturday Supercade section needs a bit more information. Otherwise, what are your thoughts? There hasn't been much voting or comments on here, so, yeah.