About the schedule

Should the schedule be abolished?

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 72.7%
  • No

    Votes: 9 27.3%

  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .
BMB, I actually read your post, and you just said everything I had in mind, but much better.

Except the part on hosts not being ready when it's their turn. (which I admit has happened to me too, on my first game here)
 
oh good grief all the wallposts

ain't nobody got time fo dat

I'm for abolition of the schedule. Like most people have said, people can stop themselves from being involved in too many games if they want. Not a huge problem.

i like the term "abolition" of the schedule, it's such a revolutionary way of saying it

If Nabber and BMB want to convince me (and everyone else) otherwise, shorten your posts so I'll actually have time to read them.

on a completely unrelated note, abolition of the schedule will make the mafia hosts guild 100% useless, which would make this a good step on the way to my goal of disbanding the guild
 
Dr. Javelin said:
on a completely unrelated note, abolition of the schedule will make the mafia hosts guild 100% useless, which would make this a good step on the way to my goal of disbanding the guild

i'll bet they'd still find some other excuse to exist. :waluigi:
 
they'll do anything to keep their precious oligarchy going

why though beats me. probably to keep their dark green stars to set them apart from the common masses
 
Dr. Javelin said:
Like most people have said, people can stop themselves from being involved in too many games if they want. Not a huge problem.
Let me say one thing on this matter.

If there are 10 Mafia's, people may miss out themes they really like.

Furthermore, if everyone only joins 2 out of 10 games, how are the hosts supposed to get enough players?
 
Dr. Javelin said:
they'll do anything to keep their precious oligarchy going

why though beats me. probably to keep their dark green stars to set them apart from the common masses

i know what you could do

you could host some mafia games, join the guild, and sabotage them from the inside!

or maybe you could just get yoshiwaker to sabotage them, idk maybe that would be easier?
 
I have decided to change sides after thinking about Jungle Mafia.

Let people take the time they want and then start is feels right, although my point of players "focusing" on one mafia still stands.
 
ジュゲムザクイック said:
Dr. Javelin said:
Like most people have said, people can stop themselves from being involved in too many games if they want. Not a huge problem.
Let me say one thing on this matter.

If there are 10 Mafia's, people may miss out themes they really like.

Furthermore, if everyone only joins 2 out of 10 games, how are the hosts supposed to get enough players?
The hosts will just have to make their games more appealing to the players. If they don't, then they just won't be able to host their game. That's a system called competition, part of a greater system called capitalism.
Pearl said:
Dr. Javelin said:
they'll do anything to keep their precious oligarchy going

why though beats me. probably to keep their dark green stars to set them apart from the common masses

i know what you could do

you could host some mafia games, join the guild, and sabotage them from the inside!

or maybe you could just get yoshiwaker to sabotage them, idk maybe that would be easier?
That would be easier indeed, but Yoshiwaker makes his own decisions. I'm not my brother's keeper.
 
Dr. Javelin said:
ジュゲムザクイック said:
Dr. Javelin said:
Like most people have said, people can stop themselves from being involved in too many games if they want. Not a huge problem.
Let me say one thing on this matter.

If there are 10 Mafia's, people may miss out themes they really like.

Furthermore, if everyone only joins 2 out of 10 games, how are the hosts supposed to get enough players?
The hosts will just have to make their games more appealing to the players. If they don't, then they just won't be able to host their game. That's a system called competition, part of a greater system called capitalism.
Which will make it less fair and less fun.
 
New Super Mario said:
I would still like a more "one at a time" kind of thing, even though no one else does.

I can focus more if I'm only playing one game, IMO.

then only play one game at a time?