The Koopalings are NOT Bowser's Children.

Legolas said:
JohnRoberts said:
You know what? I think I know where I'm going to go with this. *puts on trench coat* Tonight, on Unsolved Mysteries, we're going to talk about what the case of Shigeru Miyamoto saying that Bowser Jr. is the only child and the Koopalings are not Bowser's children does. UPDATE! Several Koopaling fans are infuriated by this statement. UPDATE! Several questions have been raised relating to this statement, so how many questions does this raise? UPDATE! The amount of questions raised is countless. UPDATE! Now there is a giant truckload of theories relating to those questions. A few of them are: 1. They might be related to Bowser in another way. 2. They are the children of a minion (such as Boom-Boom and/or Pom-Pom). 3. They were made with (the unnatural combination of science and) magic. 4. They really are Bowser's children but Bowser just won't admit it. 5. Bowser disowned them. 6. They are adopted. 7. They are the children of a character that isn't even in the games (yet). 8. Bowser split into two and one of the sides had the Koopalings. UPDATE! Theories , 3, 6, and 8 are absolutely retarded (because they make no sense what so ever.), SO SCREW THEM! The rest I will accept. UPDATE! I just came up with these questions: Does Nintendo give a crap about them? Are they somebodies or nobodies? UPDATE! Apparently Nintendo doesn't give a crap about these Koopalings (or their fans)! Nintendo sees them as nobodies while we see them as somebodies! UPDATE! Who is/are the best Koopaling(s)? (You CAN say Bowser Jr. but I will punch you if you say that, even if you're just testing me. The Mario Party mini-bowsers are not a valid answer.)

Oh, and Squirtle. Just because they look different does NOT mean they aren't the same thing. they could have easily chosen to change their looks, the reason their shell colors changed and they now have rings around their spikes could just be puberty.
Click to expand...

Iggy is the best. Anyways, who said that Miamoto was allowed to come up with backstories anyways!
Click to expand...
I don't know. Maybe it would actually make the characters more interesting or something like that.

Squirtle said:
Iggy's hair color changed

And now his hair looks like three bananas
Click to expand...
What says he didn't want his hair to be like that?
 
New Year Baby Luigi said:
Why is he called BABY Mario!? Would you name your kid after yourself and put "baby" in front of it?
Click to expand...
Well? Obviously it was an example. Don't take it serious.
 
Dorayaki said:
New Year Baby Luigi said:
Why is he called BABY Mario!? Would you name your kid after yourself and put "baby" in front of it?
Click to expand...
Well? Obviously it was an example. Don't take it serious.
Click to expand...

I know it was an example. It was a terrible one
 
JohnRoberts said:
I don't even see how this is possible. The Koopalings still both look and act like Bowser's children. Either Nintendo is trying to make the Koopaling fans happy or Nintendo decided to make them the children of Bowser or they are related to him in another way.
Click to expand...

I don't even know why they retconned it in the first place. It looks like they're TRYING to get the fans angry
 
Baby Luigi said:
JohnRoberts said:
I don't even see how this is possible. The Koopalings still both look and act like Bowser's children. Either Nintendo is trying to make the Koopaling fans happy or Nintendo decided to make them the children of Bowser or they are related to him in another way.
Click to expand...

I don't even know why they retconned it in the first place. It looks like they're TRYING to get the fans angry
Click to expand...

Miyamoto is a successful troll then. Either that or he's just running out of ideas. Or maybe he just doesn't give a !@#$ about the Koopalings and he thinks it's all about the overrated Bowser Jr.
 
Champion Christmas said:
Why do you care though? Whether or not the koopalings are his children does not effect the gameplay at all.
Click to expand...

It brings down their character and makes the Koopa family less interesting and colorful. (Bowser and Jr. are waaaaaay too alike.) Also, this is going to affect Koopaling fanboys/fangirls who hate Bowser Jr. Also, this raises way too many questions and theories. (Some of which are down right retarded.) I will continue to think they are his kids no matter what Shiggy says for valid reasons.
 
JohnRoberts said:
Champion Christmas said:
Why do you care though? Whether or not the koopalings are his children does not effect the gameplay at all.
Click to expand...

It brings down their character and makes the Koopa family less interesting and colorful. (Bowser and Jr. are waaaaaay too alike.) Also, this is going to affect Koopaling fanboys/fangirls who hate Bowser Jr. Also, this raises way too many questions and theories. (Some of which are down right retarded.) I will continue to think they are his kids no matter what Shiggy says for valid reasons.
Click to expand...
>Implying that the koopalings were interesting to begin with