Super Smash Bros. Ultimate

Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

The characters I see that have the highest chance of not returning are the 3 last minute additions, Greninja and Corrin (parent developers may push for newer characters) and I guess any third party character not Sonic aren't technically safe.
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

As I said in another thread, if we DO get any new Mario characters playable, then we're probably going to see others cut from the roster.
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

i think its time to cut jigglypuff

she had a good run, but she's a useless pile of crap and nobody has played as her since melee

like seriously, how popular is jigglypuff over in japan that they felt they absolutely needed to have her in the wii u and 3ds games
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

If we could add a Zelda character, I'd choose Impa.
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

Magikrazy said:
i think its time to cut jigglypuff

she had a good run, but she's a useless pile of crap and nobody has played as her since melee

like seriously, how popular is jigglypuff over in japan that they felt they absolutely needed to have her in the wii u and 3ds games

It's pretty much too late for that now. Even if by chance they do decide to leave Jigglypuff out of the main game. I'd HIGHLY expect them to include Jigglypuff in DLC. But I feel she's likely to be kept just out of tradition, plus she's a relatively easy character to develop.

(Also for some reason I like using her in Smash 4 more then I have in any previous game. Don't know why, I just do)

J-Yoshi64 said:
As I said in another thread, if we DO get any new Mario characters playable, then we're probably going to see others cut from the roster.

Why would adding any new Mario characters mean someone has to go? We still have a likely chance of just about everyone coming back through the roster being ported over. With the only reason for anyone being cut is if the 3rd party companies decline to a re-issuing of the license. Or there's a mechanic from the previous game that's missing that the character was essential to. (Even then that mostly just leads to a slight revamp. Like Shiek and Zero Suit Samus being seperate characters, or Charizard being alone all because the 3DS can't process transformations in Smash)
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

Northern Verve said:
Magikrazy said:
i think its time to cut jigglypuff

she had a good run, but she's a useless pile of crap and nobody has played as her since melee

like seriously, how popular is jigglypuff over in japan that they felt they absolutely needed to have her in the wii u and 3ds games

It's pretty much too late for that now. Even if by chance they do decide to leave Jigglypuff out of the main game. I'd HIGHLY expect them to include Jigglypuff in DLC. But I feel she's likely to be kept just out of tradition, plus she's a relatively easy character to develop.

(Also for some reason I like using her in Smash 4 more then I have in any previous game. Don't know why, I just do)
Maybe because she actually looks game accurate now and not dead inside.
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!!!

https://kotaku.com/microsoft-executive-is-open-to-putting-banjo-in-the-new-1823955922
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

One of my brother's mains is Jigglypuff, so I can see him being upset if she got cut. Plus, she's a veteran.

Northern Verve said:
J-Yoshi64 said:
As I said in another thread, if we DO get any new Mario characters playable, then we're probably going to see others cut from the roster.

Why would adding any new Mario characters mean someone has to go? We still have a likely chance of just about everyone coming back through the roster being ported over. With the only reason for anyone being cut is if the 3rd party companies decline to a re-issuing of the license. Or there's a mechanic from the previous game that's missing that the character was essential to. (Even then that mostly just leads to a slight revamp. Like Shiek and Zero Suit Samus being seperate characters, or Charizard being alone all because the 3DS can't process transformations in Smash)
I was thinking more so the roster wouldn't be so heavy with Mario characters. We had seven in Sm4sh (Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser, Dr. Mario, Rosalina, and Bowser Jr.), and that just seems like a bit much to me.
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

I was predicting that the game might get delayed back to 2019, but now I'm sceptical about that if they will have a playable build ready by E3.
 
Re: Super Smash Bros. For Nintendo Switch

J-Yoshi64 said:
One of my brother's mains is Jigglypuff, so I can see him being upset if she got cut. Plus, she's a veteran.

Northern Verve said:
J-Yoshi64 said:
As I said in another thread, if we DO get any new Mario characters playable, then we're probably going to see others cut from the roster.

Why would adding any new Mario characters mean someone has to go? We still have a likely chance of just about everyone coming back through the roster being ported over. With the only reason for anyone being cut is if the 3rd party companies decline to a re-issuing of the license. Or there's a mechanic from the previous game that's missing that the character was essential to. (Even then that mostly just leads to a slight revamp. Like Shiek and Zero Suit Samus being seperate characters, or Charizard being alone all because the 3DS can't process transformations in Smash)
I was thinking more so the roster wouldn't be so heavy with Mario characters. We had seven in Sm4sh (Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser, Dr. Mario, Rosalina,