If you could erase 1 character from existence who would it be?

Some has to have this opinion and I might as well be me.

Rosalina. Trash character.
 
Walkazo said:
Baby Rosalina. As if her image as an ageless mystical goddess wasn't torched enough by her paling around with everyone - but then they had to go and turn her into a dang baby. Ugh.
Click to expand...

She was never an ageless Goddess.

B.Rosalina is still shit though.
 
Baby Luigi said:
yeah baby rosalina should have stayed as a fan concept rather than become an official thing

she and baby daisy have virtually no impact on the mario series, so I kinda retract my stance with saying that getting rid of babies means getting rid of mario luigi or whatever.

this applies only to the spin-off only babies, my point still stands with the rest.
Click to expand...
The point can't stand only with some, it's the same principle for all babies. I wouldn't make them disappear from existence because that'd obviously make the adults disappear, but I'd make them disappear from every single game.
 
Hard one for me. I'd probably wipe a spinoff only character from existence, like Baby Daisy or Pink Gold Peach. Or maybe an obnoxious RPG one, like the Star Gate or the Dream Stone Spirit.

If it was mainstream ones only, then goodbye Bowser Jr.
 
Mcmadness said:
Walkazo said:
Baby Rosalina. As if her image as an ageless mystical goddess wasn't torched enough by her paling around with everyone - but then they had to go and turn her into a dang baby. Ugh.
Click to expand...

She was never an ageless Goddess.

B.Rosalina is still *bleep* though.
Click to expand...

She does have quite a huge lifespan though
 
Baby Luigi said:
Mcmadness said:
Walkazo said:
Baby Rosalina. As if her image as an ageless mystical goddess wasn't torched enough by her paling around with everyone - but then they had to go and turn her into a dang baby. Ugh.
Click to expand...

She was never an ageless Goddess.

B.Rosalina is still *bleep* though.
Click to expand...
She does have quite a huge lifespan though
Click to expand...
Considering that Super Mario Galaxy 2 took place 100 years after the first one, I do think that every character has a set age, and babies are separate from their adult counterparts.
 
Hey I think the babies are separate from the adults as well. I think they come from a separate timeline, hence why their actions in the present are not affecting....well the present.

However I don't buy that Super Mario Galaxy 2 took place 100 years after the first one. I think continuity took a nose-dive there; they just outright ignored it.
 
So removing babies from existence won't have any major consequences?