Baby Rosalina Theory

MnSG

Cosmic Beauty
In case anyone never got the message, Rosalina's infant form has been confirmed to appear in Mario Kart 8, and this has been stirring up a major controversy with Rosalina's Storybook. However, what people are failing to realize is that the events of Rosalina's Storybook took place after her toddler life. It should also be noted that spin-off materials are not canon to the mainstream Mario series.

Anyway, with that said, here's a theory that I've had in my head, regarding Rosalina's toddler time period.
------------------------
As a baby, Rosalina was the crown princess of a peaceful kingdom that was ruled by her mother and father. One day, Rosalina grew fond of the hair bang covering her right eye, and decided to make it a signature hair style. However, as Rosalina grew older, her parents were about to have another baby. Knowing that her parents would want her to look more appropriate for her princess status, especially with the new baby coming, Rosalina reluctantly gave up her hair bang, but decided to dye her hair red to change things around.

Rosalina's brother was then born, and the family lived a peaceful life for the next set of years. During that time, Rosalina spent time learning Astronomy, and became fascinated with outer space. But one night, before turning in for the night, Rosalina notices an odd-looking star landing somewhere near her kingdom, and decided to check it out.

From there, the story from Rosalina's Storybook began, and after the story's epilogue, Rosalina went back to her natural hair color, and regrew her hair bang during the process.
------------------------
How does this sound for my theory? I wanted to at least make some sense out of the Baby Rosalina dilemma.
 
MnSG said:
In case anyone never got the message, Rosalina's infant form has been confirmed to appear in Mario Kart 8, and this has been stirring up a major controversy with Rosalina's Storybook. However, what people are failing to realize is that the events of Rosalina's Storybook took place after her toddler life. It should also be noted that spin-off materials are not canon to the mainstream Mario series.
This is what I trying to argue for 490234 posts and counting now.
 
It's hard to convince people.
 
This is the game series where Mario doesn't recall racing an adult version of himself when he was a baby.
 
Holograms.

The Baby appearances up to MK:DD!! could be explained by saying they happened before the babies went back to the past in M&L:PiT, but once Baby Daisy, Dry Bowser and Rosalina (not even Baby Rosalina, just regular, cosmic deity Rosalina) got involved, nope, that's it. Holograms.

Or everything from MKWii onwards is actually VR, hence Mario and Luigi were racing make-believe karts and steering Wii Wheels in the intro movie: it's all just videogames for them too.
 
My "theory" is that Baby Rosalina's crown is just an appendage that will fall off, similar to an egg tooth in chicks.
 
Walkazo said:
Holograms.

The Baby appearances up to MK:DD!! could be explained by saying they happened before the babies went back to the past in M&L:PiT, but once Baby Daisy, Dry Bowser and Rosalina (not even Baby Rosalina, just regular, cosmic deity Rosalina) got involved, nope, that's it. Holograms.

Or everything from MKWii onwards is actually VR, hence Mario and Luigi were racing make-believe karts and steering Wii Wheels in the intro movie: it's all just videogames for them too.

Another crazy theory that it's just an actor/actress who dresses up and acts like what a baby version of those guys should

Although my headcanon firmly implants that Baby Luigi is indeed Luigi as a baby who, offscreen, returned to the present because he thinks it's fun there (mainly because killing adult Wario is fun!)
 
my theory is that mario kart isn't canon and people are really taking something unimportant too far

just to remind you, you are actually implying mario kart is canon

mario kart