post any random Mario thought on your mind

his sidekick should be Mister E. and Shroomlock tbh
 
i was thinking about harry potter and the chamber of secrets (the pc game) and realisedf. what if, like hp2, the next 3d mario had a hub world that was absolutely full of secrets in it? having power stars (or whatever the games equivalent of that may be) and the like. i know mario 64 had something of those sorts but iirc they just lead to other levels. not sure about sunshine or galaxy 1/2 though. but yea! doing a lil puzzle to unlock a room that leads you to a star, just finding a lil hidden spot, etc. did any of that make sense
 
Stork:"Where are you taking Luigi?!"
Kamek:"You may hate me but it ain't no lie, baby bye bye bye"

Baby Luigi: Fuck you.
 
According to MarioWiki
Bonechill was set free by Count Bleck. I don't remember there being any evidence that Bleck was behind Bonechill's escape from prison. Is there any?
 
Nope. Far as we know it was just a coincidence.
 
Should I edit that out then?
 
Anything without proof should be removed from the wiki.
 
OK
 
I like Bonechill's parallelism with Satan.

Too bad he suffered from Smithy syndrome by appearing for a total of 2 seconds.
 
I like Bonechill's parallelism with Satan.

Too bad he suffered from Smithy syndrome by appearing for a total of 2 seconds.
Interesting his escape which seems to be fairly soon before the heroes arrive parallels something about Satan appearing prior to a cataclysm which would end the world (in this case the chaos heart)

According to that page at least
 
Eh, I found it old hat. Seen way too many badguys doing the satan thing pretending to be clever.
 
Eh, I found it old hat. Seen way too many badguys doing the satan thing pretending to be clever.
shrug emojii where are you i need you
 
Super Paper Mario articles are notoriously poorly written because it's so hard to find the difference between the fluffly dreck and actual plot points of the game.
 
I still have nightmares about Dimentio's old wiki article.

Boy what a mess that was.
 
1581790988012.png


this dimentio personality section was from a 2013 revision. it tries WAY too hard to sound edgy. i've rewritten some of the super paper mario schlock myself, it's not easy finding a balance between neutral and being a try-hard
 
I still have nightmares about Dimentio's old wiki article.

Boy what a mess that was.
I don't ever remember that article being bad or different to how it is now. Was it drastically re-written at any point?

Edit: I've seen @Redshift 's post and again I wish I had a shrug emojii. It's a bit flowery but I don't see anything badly wrong with it and both the present version and the one in your post fairly summarize how I feel about the character.
 
count bleck's current personality section desparately needs a rewrite
 
Meh. It's writing style feels a bit unprofessional but it's OK imo
 
no, it's not okay.

"more unique figure amoung the mario rogues gallery". the very first sentence reeks of 2007 type writing. it uses colorful words and adjectives already to describe "mario villains", and uses the loaded "unique" figure and how "omg he is a sad lover villain". the first paragraph just needs to say "count bleck is a villain motivated by regret". you cut to the crap by eliminating verbiose usage. another sentence clearly paints a bias in his favor: "He is a tragic villain, whose actions are born from the purest of emotions: love", it's not written like a quote which is just plain...ugggggh. "He, at first, seems to be a stereotypical villain with no feelings, but it is soon revealed that Bleck is an emotionally tortured person, who is not as evil as he first appears.", which i'd also argue that he's stereotypical as well. that were the first three sentences of his section. i'd imagine the rest of his section is probably like this and i don't want to be there all day tearing apart its bad writing.

it's not okay. it needs a rewrite template.
 
no, it's not okay.

"more unique figure amoung the mario rogues gallery". the very first sentence reeks of 2007 type writing. it uses colorful words and adjectives already to describe "mario villains", and uses the loaded "unique" figure and how "omg he is a sad lover villain". the first paragraph just needs to say "count bleck is a villain motivated by regret". you cut to the crap by eliminating verbiose usage. another sentence clearly paints a bias in his favor: "He is a tragic villain, whose actions are born from the purest of emotions: love", it's not written like a quote which is just plain...ugggggh. "He, at first, seems to be a stereotypical villain with no feelings, but it is soon revealed that Bleck is an emotionally tortured person, who is not as evil as he first appears.", which i'd also argue that he's stereotypical as well. that were the first three sentences of his section. i'd imagine the rest of his section is probably like this and i don't want to be there all day tearing apart its bad writing.

it's not okay. it needs a rewrite template.
i kind of see what you mean but i don't think it's that bad
 
no, it's bad.

it had been worse in the past where it got unfeatured for its poor writing but it's still screaming for a rewrite. dimentio's personality section is far better than count bleck's and that should be the style his article should be going for.
 
I just found your MarioWiki userpage @Redshift I liked it
 
Back