General Discussion

I noticed that most of the new enemies from Super Mario Bros. Wonder that only had Japanese names now have their English names mentioned on the Wiki. This has probably been the case for quite some time but does anyone know when these were updated?
 
I consulted a community discussion archive and I believe what happens is the following
  1. Mario Portal's Super Mario Bros. Wonder page is updated to have an enemy listing on January 23rd 2025. Mario Portal is available in Japanese and English, therefore it has an English version of that enemy listing
  2. Editors notice and update the pages of the previously unnamed in English Super Mario Bros. Wonder enemies accordingly.
Checking the revision history of Super Mario Wiki pages on Super Mario Bros. Wonder enemies who had their names changed from Japanese ones to English ones should confirm this. For instance, Dark Nokonoko became Rift Koopa on that very date. (revision history link) You may also want to ask Nintendo101, the user who reported the Mario Portal update and generally keeps an eye on that website.
 
Salmancer said:
I consulted a community discussion archive and I believe what happens is the following
  1. Mario Portal's Super Mario Bros. Wonder page is updated to have an enemy listing on January 23rd 2025. Mario Portal is available in Japanese and English, therefore it has an English version of that enemy listing
  2. Editors notice and update the pages of the previously unnamed in English Super Mario Bros. Wonder enemies accordingly.
Checking the revision history of Super Mario Wiki pages on Super Mario Bros. Wonder enemies who had their names changed from Japanese ones to English ones should confirm this. For instance, Dark Nokonoko became Rift Koopa on that very date. (revision history link) You may also want to ask Nintendo101, the user who reported the Mario Portal update and generally keeps an eye on that website.
Click to expand...
Thanks that makes a lot of sense.
 
I'm looking forward to make a proposal that aims to create a {{spoilers}} template. First of all, the list of references in film contains respective sections regarding Scott Pilgrim vs. the World and Zombieland: Double Tap whose content may not be suitable for young readers. Second of all, the list of controversies contains content that may not be suitable for young readers. And third of all, according to the page regarding Couic d'or !, clicking on a mouse results in blood appearing. But lucky for me, I created a draft regarding the {{spoilers}} template. You got any evidence for the possibility to make the proposal that aims to create the {{spoilers}} template?
 
I don't think it's necessary, to be honest. The warning for harsh language reminds me of the whole Bob Hoskins page debate because of a couple of swears in his quote.
 
GuntherBayBeee said:
I'm looking forward to make a proposal that aims to create a {{spoilers}} template. First of all, the list of references in film contains respective sections regarding Scott Pilgrim vs. the World and Zombieland: Double Tap whose content may not be suitable for young readers. Second of all, the list of controversies contains content that may not be suitable for young readers. And third of all, according to the page regarding Couic d'or !, clicking on a mouse results in blood appearing. But lucky for me, I created a draft regarding the {{spoilers}} template. You got any evidence for the possibility to make the proposal that aims to create the {{spoilers}} template?
Click to expand...
Didn't we already go through this before?
 
None of these are necessary and all of these are sorely on the responsibility of readers. We are not a site for children, and we're an encyclopedia that documents everything Mario, the onus is on you to not click on content that can potentially spoil you. And with the deluge of what is considered a "spoiler" nowadays (ranging from a Nintendo Direct advertisement content being revealed earlier than their preplanned date to how a final boss looks like), I'd rather not go down this rabbithole.
 
Hey, just throwing this out there and it's a minor thing, but we already had the Penguin in Wario Land ican become unbeatable fun fact two weeks ago.
 
I'm thinking about making a proposal for a template saying that a glitch can not be preformed anymore due to patches. I'm also aiming to add glitches that don't work anymore. That's why I made the template? Should I do the proposal?
 
If it's easier to show all the deprecated glitches, it could be just better if we reorganize the glitch page to have a subsection for those glitches. A template is generally used to ease on repetitive text and coding, but I don't think it's the solution here to help label which glitches are deprecated, especially when I think the body text in the article already kind of accomplishes the job.
 
Xiahou Dun said:
If it's easier to show all the deprecated glitches, it could be just better if we reorganize the glitch page to have a subsection for those glitches. A template is generally used to ease on repetitive text and coding, but I don't think it's the solution here to help label which glitches are deprecated, especially when I think the body text in the article already kind of accomplishes the job.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah, that makes sense. I forgot that there's multiple patched glitches in both games. We should definitely make a subsection.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back