Galaxy 1 or 2

Which is better? Galaxy 1 or 2

  • Galaxy 1

    Votes: 27 48.2%

  • Galaxy 2

    Votes: 14 25.0%

  • Both

    Votes: 12 21.4%

  • Neither

    Votes: 3 5.4%
  • Total voters
    56
I'm not one who cares for graphics. I mind if the gameplay is good and enjoyable. I do adore ecstasy-looking graphics, however, which is why I love the look to the Galaxy games. Whether or not they are just sprites... IDC. lol

Also, I'm 19(i don't act like it, though. i feel "older")... That makes me the middle-aged group of this forum?
 
well, i think the average age is somewhere around 12-14

then as the age climbs, the number of users that age decreases

mason is probably the oldest (somewhere around 25?), though i'm not really sure
 
Dr. Javelin said:
well, i think the average age is somewhere around 12-14

then as the age climbs, the number of users that age decreases

mason is probably the oldest (somewhere around 25?), though i'm not really sure
Click to expand...

well me and mason are among the oldest so it wouldnt surprise me

overall forum is pretty young though

i remember in mfgg there was a guy that was like 40.
 
Mario Party X said:
Yeah, they do look like low-end Gamecube models. They don't even have a mouth; it's only a texture.

But, Galaxy 2 didn't even improve it slightly, and reviewers are hailing it as a "graphical triumph" and that other crap.
Click to expand...

Actually, I learned that a Wii IS a gamecube. It just has motion controls added. Like the circuit boards and such are the same. No joke
 
Let me tell you something, nowadays, graphics don't mean shit. We're looking towards gameplay. Take Minecraft for example, blocky, low graphics, and yet people love it. I know that's the style they intended on, but still, it proves that graphics really don't have any effect on anything

would you rather have a fantastic game with shitty graphics or a shitty game with fantastic graphics?
 
Kingbowser99 said:
would you rather have a fantastic game with *bleep*ty graphics or a *bleep*ty game with fantastic graphics?
Click to expand...

I would rather have a fantastic game with fantastic graphics
 
Kingbowser99 said:
Let me tell you something, nowadays, graphics don't mean shit. We're looking towards gameplay. Take Minecraft for example, blocky, low graphics, and yet people love it. I know that's the style they intended on, but still, it proves that graphics really don't have any effect on anything

would you rather have a fantastic game with shitty graphics or a shitty game with fantastic graphics?
Click to expand...

i find this comment hilarious as the 3ds was revealed fans went apeshit over the fact that it would have better graphics than the wii.

dont even make me pull out wii u on this.

on that note wind waker is even achieved and noticed because of its unique graphical style and many fans praise it to be incredible.

you obviously dont know much about graphics.

hell why do think people call mario kiddy? because it doesnt look realistic. Why do think most mario fans are not interested in realistic games? because it has no style.

Graphics are EVERYTHING as everything else, do not pull this weakling excuse of GRAPHICS DONT MEAN SHIT ITS ALL GAMEPLAY scenario, graphics matter, as they themselves can make an impact, such as metroid primes incredible atmosphere to many metroid fans it was glorious to any fan, such as myself. They might not matter to YOU but plenty of people feel like they matter. I mean im sure if we went back to white lines and black backgrounds people would lose all interest in videos games.

also btw minecraft has retex mods and whatnot so your argument again is meaningless.
 
^Good posts, you exactly summed up my thoughts on the whole "GRAPHICS DON'T MEAN SQUAT" argument.

Both graphics and gameplay make an excellent game. That's why even Nintendo attempts to make their games look good...great presentation of games would mean better sales. Nice looking games grab people's attentions. Sometimes, having good graphics mean that the developers spent much effort in the game in general.

That's not always true since some games are just all glitter and no gold but my point still stands.
 
galaxy 2
i just enjoy it more, it has yoshi, more stuff, and what have you.
 
I feel that graphics enhance the game to make it much more enjoyable experience, but I don't think it should be compared to graphics of other games, but rather to itself. Like, with Wind Waker HD coming out, the graphics are going to make the game much more enjoyable than the original mostly because of the graphics. It's not going to change the experience so to say, but it just makes the game feel a lot more...refined.

On that note, even though Super Mario Galaxy & Super Mario Galaxy 2's graphics could be improved, I still love the games and the graphics, and I really feel that it was a great game.