Current Vandal on Wiki

[Hobbes]

Nothing to worry about, guys.

 

[Duskull]

Fair enough, I've only been here since January and I don't keep up with troll history

 

[Pinkie]

Good to know Turboo blocked him, so nothing more from him.

 

[Walkazo]

It's probably just some imposter anyway. The downside of Userpedia is that folks read it, see the names, and decide they might make a bigger stir by pretending to be infamous trolls returning, rather than the lifeless nobodies they really are. Either way, nothing to get excited about: that's what they want, after all. Just report them, revert them, and forget them once they're blocked.

 

[Pinkie]

Good. That's nice for some people to know for the future

 

[Duskull]

I never got the point for reporting, the admin will likely see them quite soon after they get created and start vandalizing.

 

[Xiahou Ba]

I never got the point for reporting, the admin will likely see them quite soon after they get created and start vandalizing.

Sometimes they don't. Just sometimes.

 

[Dardy]

I thought it was just one or two at the start, and when I realized there was a lot more I logged back in, just to fight. I was planning to sleep before all that.

Same here

 

[EctoBiologist]

I never got the point for reporting, the admin will likely see them quite soon after they get created and start vandalizing.

Sometimes they don't. Just sometimes.

does that even include really minor edits to add a single word like a swear word in every article.

 

[Duskull]

Most people check the edits of an IP or new user to make sure what they've put is needed, if they see a swear word it'll be removed and it'll probably be in the edit summery so an admin could see it

 

[Xiahou Ba]

There's a user who is making constructive edits but blatantly nonsensical edit summaries

I think someone should tell him to stop.