1) Sonic the Fighters was released before Super Smash Bros..Yoshidude99 said:Well no one minded when sega did it with Sonic the Fighters
No. The only thing similar about the two is that they're fighting games. *facepalm*Yoshidude99 said:Then nintendo ripped of Sonic the Fighters first
coughNewPlaystationControllerscoughMCD said:No. The only thing similar about the two is that they're fighting games. *facepalm*Yoshidude99 said:Then nintendo ripped of Sonic the Fighters first
On topic: I wish I could say I was surprised, but I wasn't.
Kratos might have been worthwile... If they hadn't already milked the hell out of him in Soul Calibur and Mortal Kombat.Northern Verve said:Meh, not really interested because Sony's lineup of franchises are not nearly as cherished as Nintendo's are. I might rent it sometime if there's at least one character that's worth playing as but otherwise. I don't think so
that, basicallyGlowsquid said:3: lol @ fanboi rage.
Yes, but the casual gamers are still much more likely to pick up a game with Mario fighting Pikachu than they are a game with Sackboy fighting Daxter.Ned Kelly said:They have plenty of games to feature in a crossover fighting game. Barring differences in taste, they have Uncharted, InFamous, Killzone, Ratchet & Clank, Sly Cooper, Jak and Daxter, God of War, Twisted Metal, LittleBigPlanet, Valkyria Chronicles, just to name a few. The people who say Sony have no franchises or that they aren't any good are clearly biased.
That's what first and second-party development teams are for!Pinkie Pie said:Well, sure Sony has a variety of franchises, but I've actually never seen any games that they actually developed.
I don't think R.O.B. would be suitable in a fighting game. I don't think Phoenix Wright would be suitable in a fighting game. But we did it anyway. And it was worth it.Pinkie Pie said:Also, I don't think a Sackboy would be suitable in a fighting game, but why not. :P.
Now you're just splitting hairs; I think you underestimate the popularity of Sony's franchises. Actually, what's your point again? Because I'm sure your actual point was stating that Sony were ripping off an idea from Nintendo that, by your logic, was ripping off Capcom.SiFi said:Yes, but the casual gamers are still much more likely to pick up a game with Mario fighting Pikachu than they are a game with Sackboy fighting Daxter.
Exactly my point! Thank you so much.Christian Brutal Sniper said:Seriously though, are people really being butthurt about a game company making a fighter game based off their characters? It's not like Nintendo's the first/only one to do it.