I once asked about if Mario actually stole the Princess Peach statue in the Wario Land: Super Mario Land 3 article, because the context of the game (between manual and the ending) indicates that Mario isn't a thief.
One person responded that he in fact did, even though the game's actions didn't line up. Separately from that response, the person mentioned how it's all semantics (indicating that it is too insignificant to argue about). But I would say that for a wiki, putting in the accurate semantic is important because, wikis are meant to be factual so if we misrepresent a fact, then it would send the wrong message.
One recent thing that it happened was that DK's Stone Statue mentioned how the star purchase was like Faire Square, which should've imply that you can buy multiple stars, but can be assumed as maxing out to 5 stars only. But that's not the case. A Let's Play collab got it wrong from this article, which affected the players' decision making.
I can already imagine that if it weren't changed to more accurately portray the game's event, some guy will use the original sentence (of Mario stealing the statue like he's a thief) as proof that Mario's a villain.
im tired of being the kind of person that brings out the worst in people
got banned from a place for owning a queerphobe because said queerphobe manipulated screenshots to make me look in the wrong.
the fact an anti-lgbtqia person is believed over me just because one mod has a bias against me specifically is wilddd
During this weekend (starting now) I will be playing Super Mario 3D World + Bowser's Fury (100% the games too!), so I won't be as active as I usually am. Fear not! I'll still check in from time to time.