More Conspiracy Theories from the Nut House: Game Theory's Mario Timeline

Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

yoshiking14x said:
Another mystery is how Rosalina got her powers.
Click to expand...

The lumas made her immortal, and she has star power!
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

That explains why do the Lumas expire or die, because they give too much power or something.
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

yoshiking14x said:
Another mystery is how Rosalina got her powers.
Click to expand...

Why don't you ask why Mario has super jumping ability
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

Baby Luigi said:
yoshiking14x said:
Another mystery is how Rosalina got her powers.
Click to expand...

Why don't you ask why Mario has super jumping ability
Click to expand...
Or how about Luigi's in SPM, so high that it was able to surpass our point of view?
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

This is my theory:
In the secret ending you can see Rosalina leaving Gateway Galaxy with the Comet Observatory.Then you can see a Luma left behind in a spaceship.But that´s how the whole thing started in the storybook.The Luma´s mother left him behind and she is traveling on a comet(Comet Observatory?).So the young Rosalina will find the Luma again(after she is born in the new cycle-this would support the theory of her being Peach´s daughter) and the story starts over.But then we have one unanswered question:What happens to the adult Rosalina then?I am asking this because if my theory is correct,that would mean that there already was an adult Rosalina(the Luma´s mother) before our current Rosalina(who else would have been the Luma´s mother in the storybook?The ending pretty much confirms it was Rosalina herself) and this is an unending cycle.The other possibility is that the mother of the Luma is a different person in each cycle,but they all play the same role(mother of Luma´s,some sort of watcher of space).But even then,what happens to the previous mother of the Luma,remains unexplained.Thoughts?
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

Good Game said:
In the secret ending you can see Rosalina leaving Gateway Galaxy with the Comet Observatory.Then you can see a Luma left behind in a spaceship.But that´s how the whole thing started in the storybook.The Luma´s mother left him behind and she is traveling on a comet(Comet Observatory?).So the young Rosalina will find the Luma again(after she is born in the new cycle-this would support the theory of her being Peach´s daughter) and the story starts over.But then we have one unanswered question:What happens to the adult Rosalina then?I am asking this because if my theory is correct,that would mean that there already was an adult Rosalina(the Luma´s mother) before our current Rosalina(who else would have been the Luma´s mother in the storybook?The ending pretty much confirms it was Rosalina herself) and this is an unending cycle.Thoughts?
Click to expand...

Makes a lot of sense actually.

Let's just assume the adult Rosalina went on to kick some ass in SSB4.
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

Good Game said:
This is my theory:
In the secret ending you can see Rosalina leaving Gateway Galaxy with the Comet Observatory.Then you can see a Luma left behind in a spaceship.But that´s how the whole thing started in the storybook.The Luma´s mother left him behind and she is traveling on a comet(Comet Observatory?).So the young Rosalina will find the Luma again(after she is born in the new cycle-this would support the theory of her being Peach´s daughter) and the story starts over.But then we have one unanswered question:What happens to the adult Rosalina then?I am asking this because if my theory is correct,that would mean that there already was an adult Rosalina(the Luma´s mother) before our current Rosalina(who else would have been the Luma´s mother in the storybook?The ending pretty much confirms it was Rosalina herself) and this is an unending cycle.The other possibility is that the mother of the Luma is a different person in each cycle,but they all play the same role(mother of Luma´s,some sort of watcher of space).But even then,what happens to the previous mother of the Luma,remains unexplained.Thoughts?
Click to expand...

Edited.
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

MidnaFreak said:
Makes a lot of sense actually.

Let's just assume the adult Rosalina went on to kick some ass in SSB4.
Click to expand...

Haha,yeah. :P
I just really hope that once they will continue the story.I was so excited for SMG2 and the continuation of Rosalina´s story,but Mr.Miyamoto hugely disappointed me with that one. :D
Galaxy shows that Mario games CAN have some story.Actually Galaxy´s story is super complicated for a video game like Super Mario.And the cinematics were just awesome :D
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

Haha well yeah I personally liked the story of SPM more.

In main series mario games it's almost always Gameplay > Story so I don't mind.
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

Mcmadness said:
Lucina said:
Baby Luigi said:
Mcmadness said:
I don't buy it, or any of his theories really.
Click to expand...

yeah i've always found them stupidly convoluted and over analzying
Click to expand...
the over analzying is what makes it interesting though
Click to expand...

But then its made pointless by the fact we all know its not true.

Analysis is only truly interesting if it can lead to an actually plausible result, anything else is just pointless.
Click to expand...
Can I just jump back here for a moment.

It isn't pointless if it's entertaining and if the likes and view count are to be trusted then I'd say people do indeed enjoy these videos. That's like saying video games are pointless, they aren't made to create some sort of result they're just made to be enjoyable. Then people buy them because they want that enjoyment, so it isn't pointless to create something for the entertainment of others.
 
Re: Game Theory Tackles Rosalina (Part 1)

No one already knew this? I thought this was why people thought Rosalina was so intriguing...



Or maybe just the hair. Yeah definitely the hair.