General Discussion

This sort of stuff is better dealt with categories rather than a nav template. It's like giving books their own nav template. I say there's no point to keeping it. Though I'm not 100% too sure about deleting Blocks, as they're really a Mario thing, to have floating blocks around in Mario games so I think if it's cluttered with too much irrelevant stuff (like, I think the specific Dice Blocks from Mario Party should be trimmed out of the Block template, as they're a "subspecies" of Blocks, hell, their entry on the Block template is entirely redundant on the Dice template. I do think Dice and Block are worth keeping though but the rest, especially Doors, shouldn't be there.
 
Time Turner said:
edit: i'm a patient person, but it's been almost two weeks since i asked the question and only one person has said anything
Click to expand...

Hi.

The template looks like a mess. I mean, there are in game cards and physical cards on the list, but it's incomplete. I'd be fine with an updated overhaul, but I'd be more fine with a deletion.
 
Time Turner said:
I'll dump the full list here, for easy looking at, even if they're not romanizations (Wiki on the left, guide on the right):

Click to expand...
This is the list of enemies from the BradyGames guide for Super Mario Sunshine. They're weird, mangled romanizations of Japanese names except they don't always line up with the actual Japanese names. At the time, I dismissed them as being, but I've also picked up the Versus Books guide for SMS, and nearly all of the names are identical, right down to Skeeters being "Blue Spiders" and Klambers being "Yellow Spiders". The only names that don't match are the series-staple enemies; BradyGames continues with the weird names, while Versus Books uses the traditional names ("Geeso" vs. Blooper, "Pakkun Flower" vs. Piranha Plant, etc.). With two separate guides written by separate people and published by separate companies, I have to wonder if it's actually worth noting these names.
 
Quick idea that popped into my mind, should the Template:PArchive have hover text that displays either the color or more conveniently the outcome of the proposal? For the colorblind of us.

For example, hovering over the "(ended June 5)" of the first proposal should display "Proposal passed, result is currently enforced." for convenience.
 
Kazooie said:
Quick idea that popped into my mind, should the Template:PArchive have hover text that displays either the color or more conveniently the outcome of the proposal? For the colorblind of us.

For example, hovering over the "(ended June 5)" of the first proposal should display "Proposal passed, result is currently enforced." for convenience.
Click to expand...
If it helps out some of our users, I don't see the harm in it.
 
Most certainly yes, it's a better idea to have something that helps colorblind users out than to discriminate them.
 
The wiki has a problem with svg thumbnailing, as the File:PN Bowser.svg page shows. The svg (which you see when directly seeing the image by clicking on it) is rendered correctly by my browsers, while GIMP 2.8.22 too seems to have troubles rendering it; ImageMagick 6.9.3 on my pc doesn't have any problem on the pther hand, the image is correctly rasterized and thus png thumbnailing is possible. Could this be an issue in the svg library that was fixed recently?