General Discussion

http://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=1516.0

wrong thread
 
Would it really kill people to read?

Or just go to the Profile button on the upper side of the page? It's not rocket science.
 
They just want to get spoonfed, really.

Anyway, let's get back. If this guy responds with another inane statement, report the post.
 
A little while ago, some users expressed that MarioWiki:Maintenance could be improved in various ways, such having more entries and better organization.

What do people think of this (User:Shokora/MarioWiki:Maintenance)? Some other admins already approve, but I figured that we could run it past here and make sure that people are happy with the presentation, content and colors.
 
Certainly more categories here than last time, which is good. Makes it easier to find a specific category without having to go digging through them. And the split between different categorical sections just makes finding them even easier.

Yellow's a bit hard on the eyes, but that's probably just because I've been staring at a screen for the last two hours and am having trouble distinguishing the letters on my keyboard.

Overall, looks good to me!
 
That blob of yellow's an eyestrain, especially in comparison to the other sections' muted colours. The content itself is very good, and it seems to cover every possible maintenance category, though I have to ask why the broken file links are under general article maintenance and not files (on that note, how come it isn't "file maintenance" or some variation thereof?).
 
Would people prefer a more pale yellow? I've tried to do tweak it (compare this with this). I still think that the section should be presented in yellow, as used by a lot of notice templates relating to images.

Time Turner said:
why the broken file links are under general article maintenance and not files (on that note, how come it isn't "file maintenance" or some variation thereof?).
That was an oversight; thanks for catching that. And that section title has been reconsidered.