General Discussion

[Xiahou Ba]

I wouldn't mind. Either way works for me. I think it would be better to add a reason parameter for consistency's sake though.

 

[Hobbes]

I think it would be good to add it, and it would indeed be the most consistent thing.

 

[Driftmaster130]

to give credit, the last bit comes from Userpedia's template of the same.

 

[Hobbes]

As a general comment, the brief reasoning to be potentially included in the template is not to be a replacement of the explanation that usually follows a Last Warning. Even if the reasoning is listed on the template, users should aim to be more detailed on the offenses that led to the LW.

 

[Xiahou Ba]

Yet all the other warning templates follow the exact same rule that you should probably give a more in-depth reason accompanying it. I don't see why Last Warning should be an exception to it.

 

[Hobbes]

It shouldn't, I'm just making it very clear.

 

[Driftmaster130]

so you mean pretty much the same thing that's done with regular warnings currently?

 

[Hobbes]

Yes.

 

[Driftmaster130]

If the admins approve of it, can that part be added to the template?

 

[Glowsquid]

http://www.mariowiki.com/Template_talk:Not-unused#Useless_template.3F