UBB Week 4 HOH: Mafia (Endgame)

Re: UBB Week 4 HOH: Mafia (Day 1)

Yoshibaker said:
I'm not backing him up, I'm saying how monumentally stupid it would be to random lynch. And how about why are you still going with your bandwagon?
We've got roughly a 2 in 8 chance of hitting a Mafia, and in a small game an early Mafia death is huge. It's worth more to take a stab in the dark at a scumbag early on and risk hitting an innocent than it is to sit still and wait for Day 2, and be guaranteed one man down.
 
Re: UBB Week 4 HOH: Mafia (Day 1)

We're only nine players, so our best bet at getting scum is to just take a stab in the dark and see what falls out.

Vote: Packy
 
Re: UBB Week 4 HOH: Mafia (Day 1)

I'm just going to say that you're not going to gain anything by lynching me, but you're also not going to lose anything by lynching me. You're probably better off going with someone else (NSM, perhaps?).
 
Re: UBB Week 4 HOH: Mafia (Day 1)

May i release my input? I don't care the answer i am anyway.

If we don't lynch somebody NOW we won't have anything to go by for DAY 2.

No lynching is basically just making us sitting ducks.

Stabbing in the dark gives us a chance atleast.

##Vote:Palkia

He said we had nothing to lose so why not.
 
Re: UBB Week 4 HOH: Mafia (Day 1)

well Packy's implying he's an independent
but that doesn't really make sense according to the ratio
so Vote: Packy
 
Re: UBB Week 4 HOH: Mafia (Day 1)

Nabber said:
well Packy's implying he's an independent
but that doesn't really make sense according to the ratio
so Vote: Packy

actually it kind of could

she said it was a 1:4 ratio of innocent to mafia, which leaves a remainder of 1, which could be an indie.
 
Re: UBB Week 4 HOH: Mafia (Day 1)

Pokémon Trainer Toad85 said:
Nabber said:
well Packy's implying he's an independent
but that doesn't really make sense according to the ratio
so Vote: Packy

actually it kind of could

she said it was a 1:4 ratio of innocent to mafia, which leaves a remainder of 1, which could be an indie.
She said roughly, therefore, it's not exact.