Non-Specific Action Figure poll

Should Non-Specific Action Figure be in?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 60.0%
  • No

    Votes: 10 40.0%

  • Total voters
    25

supermariofan

Dry Bowser
Should he be in? I mean we've been getting some bizarre characters, in Melee we had Mr Game and Watch, in Brawl we had R.O.B. so here we might as well have this little Wii U promotion
 

Magikrazy

Donkey Kong
Hell no.
supermariofan said:
we had Mr Game and Watch, R.O.B.
These people were important in Nintendo history. Non-Specific Action Figure appeared in one single commercial.
 

Uniju

Hazukashii serifu kinshi
Not as a playable character. That would just be overkill. But as a trophy or a sticker or something, sure!
 

RandomYoshi

Sweden? More like Memeden.
Chat Operator
Retired Wiki Staff
Uniju said:
Not as a playable character. That would just be overkill. But as a trophy or a sticker or something, sure!
I say that even going as far as he getting his own trophy would be going too far, though I can definitely agree with you on the 'or something' part there.

And no, he should definitely not be a playable character.
 

RandomGuy

Earth Adept
A sticker would be a good idea for him because he didn't really have anything except for one commercial
 

Raven Effect

That's what I call hamburgers
Core 'Shroom Staff
Retired Wiki Staff
Super Smash Bros. is beneath one as great as Non-Specific Action Figure.
 

Smashgoom202

Dry Bowser
Retired Wiki Staff
That... would actually be pretty sweet! If not as a playable character than at least in some way, shape or form. R.O.B. made it in, although he's a LOT more important to Nintendo's history than ol' Non-Specific Action Figure.
 

Toad85

MarioKartRPG
Smashgoom202 said:
R.O.B. made it in, although he's a LOT more important to Nintendo's history than ol' Non-Specific Action Figure.
I think that's where most of the "no" votes are coming from. No one can deny that Non-Specific Action Figure is awesome, but he's never been in a game, and never contributed to gaming history.
 
Top