"New" Pokemon

YamiHoshi.nl said:
>>NintendoQueen814
I also had that magazine, it was something with "Poyo", I can't remember exactly.
I brought one, since I had a pirated cartridge with a hacked Pokémon Gold, my mother snatched from the black market in Poland, and original copies were yet to be announced in Europe.

The magazine I have is called Beckett Pokemon Collector. And it has a listing of the Gold/Silver version *Gen II* Pokemon names in roomaji (Japanese words written out using English letters)

EDIT: Haha Now I'm looking at it, and I crossed out the Japanese names and wrote in the English names for them.
 
>>Dr. Javelin
It's because Japanese words are pretty limited, and their licensed names are easier to read in Latin letters.

>>NintendoQueen814
It seems you have a different magazine.
And what do you mean by the edited line?
 
Oh, now I get it: Book modification.
 
Jerry said:
I'm a noob at Pokemon and I used to be a really big Pokemon fan and I recently just got back into it but I have no idea what all the names are. What I do know is what they look like and all the Major ones
I'm still stuck with the Japanese names of BW.
I can remember all of the Pokemon from Gen 2's cries surprisingly.
 
Herr Shyguy said:
Baby Luigi said:
Chandelure,
A chandelier with eyes doesn't count as original sorry.

More original than a triple version of a preevolution
 
I know this isn't technically a new pokemon but they should make Kangaskhan catch able
 
Tatanga said:
I know this isn't technically a new pokemon but they should make Kangaskhan catch able

Um, it is catchable ???
 
Baby Luigi said:
Tatanga said:
I know this isn't technically a new pokemon but they should make Kangaskhan catch able

Um, it is catchable ???

Idk about the newer games, but Kangaskhan is a bitch to catch in Safari Zone (older version games). Maybe that's what he meant?
 
Any Pokemon exclusive to the Safari Zone sucks to catch.
 
I love it how my sister caught a Chansey with a Lucky Egg once and she thought Lucky Eggs were common