Suggestions for Improvement

[Uniju]

Oh, then the mods should enforce it more.

Per

















lol, jk

Those posts should also be deleted, they just stupidly increase post counts, and it makes no difference having them.

Why? You guys are running the forum like it's a publishing company or something. Forums aren't suppose to be placed where you can write a book, they're places to discuss. If someone's opinion has already been stated in a thread asking for opinions, than why should he not be allowed to simply state that he agrees with the one who has already stated it?

There are some messages that can be properly conveyed with a single line. Obviously if there is no message conveyed within a post the post will be labeled as spam and deleted(as it should be), but why would you delete posts just for being short? Because they look unprofessional?

It doesn't make any sense.

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

Oh, then the mods should enforce it more.

Per

















lol, jk

Those posts should also be deleted, they just stupidly increase post counts, and it makes no difference having them.

Why? You guys are running the forum like it's a publishing company or something. Forums aren't suppose to be placed where you can write a book, they're places to discuss. If someone's opinion has already been stated in a thread asking for opinions, than why should he not be allowed to simply state that he agrees with the one who has already stated it?

There are some messages that can be properly conveyed with a single line. Obviously if there is no message conveyed within a post the post will be labeled as spam and deleted(as it should be), but why would you delete posts just for being short? Because they look unprofessional?

It doesn't make any sense.

Now, obviously, there would be topics outside of MJ/MJII where one word posts would be acceptable, an example would be the "What game did you last play?!?!?!?!?" topic.[/url]
lrn2read

 

[Uniju]

You said that there would be certain topics specified that would not be affected by the rule. I said that there are certain situations in which one word posts do everything that forums are made for people to do on, and that in every instance that single word posts are actually bad it would still be covered by a simple rule against spam.

 

[Garlic Man]

You said that there would be certain topics specified that would not be affected by the rule. I said that there are certain situations in which one word posts do everything that forums are made for people to do on, and that in every instance that single word posts are actually bad it would still be covered by a simple rule against spam.

Perhaps

 

[Hobbes]

I wish this was also a rule at the NIWA forums because then about 40% of SMB's posts would violate this rule. oO

It is. SMB is an admin, he should enforce it

 

[Garlic Man]

I wish this was also a rule at the NIWA forums because then about 40% of SMB's posts would violate this rule. oO

It is. SMB is an admin, he should enforce it

I agree with this.

Awesome.

Yes.

...?

Per.

Well, we cover M&SATOWG completely, because Mario is there. If you see SOnic, Tails or any of those articles, just info related to Mario games appears

That is correct.

Okay.

Just a few examples of such cases.

 

[Super Mario Bros.]

I'm just saying my opinion, and I will be blunt:

That rule is just plain dumb. What if the only I have to add to a conversation are those one-worded responses?

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

Then don't make a response. -_-

 

[Super Mario Bros.]

Then don't make a response. -_-

But I have a right to add my opinion. Who wants to read a whole bunch of bulecrap, when you can get to the point easily?

In example, saying "I really like this idea because..." and then adding a whole bunch of reasons that the original poster put is pointless. I might as well just say "Cool," or "Per."

 

[Garlic Man]

Then don't make a response. -_-

But I have a right to add my opinion. Who wants to read a whole bunch of bulecrap, when you can get to the point easily?

In example, saying "I really like this idea because..." and then adding a whole bunch of reasons that the original poster put is pointless. I might as well just say "Cool," or "Per."

Well, we cover M&SATOWG completely, because Mario is there. If you see SOnic, Tails or any of those articles, just info related to Mario games appears.

That is correct.

^ See this example. Your post servers no purpose whatsoever. It's like saying "That is correct" every time someone says a true statement. Tucayo wasn't even asking a question in that quote; it was a statement.

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

@SMB - Yes, but there is a rule against it. (Even though the mod's don't seem to enforce it)

It's still a rule.

 

[Super Mario Bros.]

@SMB - Yes, but there is a rule against it. (Even though the mod's don't seem to enforce it)

It's still a rule.

Well, I'm just saying that the rule sucks. But what ever.

Then don't make a response. -_-

But I have a right to add my opinion. Who wants to read a whole bunch of bulecrap, when you can get to the point easily?

In example, saying "I really like this idea because..." and then adding a whole bunch of reasons that the original poster put is pointless. I might as well just say "Cool," or "Per."

Well, we cover M&SATOWG completely, because Mario is there. If you see SOnic, Tails or any of those articles, just info related to Mario games appears.

That is correct.

^ See this example. Your post servers no purpose whatsoever. It's like saying "That is correct" every time someone says a true statement. Tucayo wasn't even asking a question in that quote; it was a statement.

Well, I'm sorry that it cannot be hosted on a server.

 

[Garlic Man]

Well, I'm sorry that it cannot be hosted on a server.

How is this related to the discussion at hand?

 

[Super Mario Bros.]

Your post servers no purpose whatsoever.

Look at the bolded word.

 

[Garlic Man]

Ok, but your one-word comments still serve no purpose.

 

[Super Mario Bros.]

Ok, but your one-word comments still serve no purpose.

Actually, they express my opinion.

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

Which doesn't contribute to the conversation.

 

[Stooben]

Rule 4 is quite silly, really.

 

[Super Mario Bros.]

Rule 4 is quite silly, really.

I agree.

 

[Garlic Man]

Rule 4 is quite silly, really.

I agree.

Per.

 

[Stooben]

I removed it.

 

[Garlic Man]

I removed it.

Ok.

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

Rule 4 is quite silly, really.

I agree.

Per.

This

 

[Hobbes]

Cool. Who created it anyway?

 

[Super Mario Bros.]

I removed it.

Good.