"Work in progress" progress?Baby Luigi said:This is my WIP progress page
It's good, but that's probably it. It won't be featured on the main page, but it's nice and complete. That's the best we can say about it. If the subject gets lucky and featured in more future games, then MAYBE it has a shot? What the consensus says right now is that good articles aren't a great idea and they do have a point.Yoshi the SSM said:Good articles sound like a good idea. But, I have an idea. What about articles that are exceptionally good, but are short (can't think of any). Would you call that good? And if it is just a few words like a one-time power-up. Should it be at least good? One-liners are discouraged from the wiki anyway, so they would never be good at all.
And if you didn't like that idea. I am thinking that the symbol for good articles would be a silver star, but if that is too good, a bronze star.
Yeah my wording tends to crap up once in a while. It happens.Alex95 said:"Work in progress" progress?
I don't think this has been brought up yet, but MarioWiki:Article size might be worth taking into consideration when thinking about this. While it mainly talks about whether pages of certain sizes should be split (btw, something might need to be done here about Mario...), the sizes it talks about might be useful here. Pages less than 40kb don't need to be divided, so by going off of that, should pages less than 40kb also not be featured?