lazy additions to pad out the Star Count in those games?
I personally do consider it to be that.
I personally do consider it to be that.
Do you consider 100 Coin Stars in Super Mario (64 (DS)/Sunshine) to be...
- Thread starter 3D Player 2004
- Start date
I don't really mind the 100 coin thing. In a sense it adds... consistency to the levels in a way. My only issue is that in SMS there are apparently some missions in which you can't do it. That's a critical design flaw right there.
The SMS blue coins though can fuck right off and die in a fire.
The SMS blue coins though can fuck right off and die in a fire.
DragonFreak
Everything that drowns me makes me wanna fly!
The hundred coins were generally easy, especially you Whomp's Fortress. There were only a few levels that were a freaking pain, like Tiny Big Mountain and that rainbow one that the name escapes me.
- Pronouns
- She/her He/him
Considering that 100%ing the game is an optional thing, I don't think it's a "tacked" on feature as you would like to call it. It promotes exploration of the level, which I do like. I've always liked collecting them in Super Mario 64 DS, though it's a ----ing pain if you die when you fall off a pit.
Really these missions are not as stupid and tedious as those damn 100 purple coins in Galaxy games, mainly because collecting Blue Coins and Red Coins adds to the count and Galaxy's levels aren't really built to be the exploration type anyway, so it sucks badly.
If you want a tacked on feature, look no further than Galaxy 2's *bleeping* Green Stars
Really these missions are not as stupid and tedious as those damn 100 purple coins in Galaxy games, mainly because collecting Blue Coins and Red Coins adds to the count and Galaxy's levels aren't really built to be the exploration type anyway, so it sucks badly.
If you want a tacked on feature, look no further than Galaxy 2's *bleeping* Green Stars