Unpopular opinions about the Super Smash Bros. series

Giga12

Giga12

Filthy weeaboo, game nerd and all-around creep
Alright, so here you can post whatever opinions you think are unpopular about SSB.

I'll start.

)I think Final Destination is boring. I don't like stages with no personality or special quirks. Of course, there are stages with too many quirks (I'm looking at you, Mario Bros.)
)I don't like Snake's inclusion in Brawl.
)I think Smash Bros. should not be a competitive fighter, and am perfectly fine with Brawl's casual style.
 
Giant Melee, 2.0, 3 CPUs fighting, -2 SDs, with Bob-ombs, Green Shells, Red Shells, Motion Sensor Bombs, Warpstars, Screw Attacks, and Party Balls, on gimmicky stages is the only true way to play Super Smash Bros. Melee
 
Not sure if this counts. But I don't consider Project M as a separate game from Brawl, the graphics, the extra stuff, are a main reason why. It's all-in-all a mod of Brawl that serves as an expansion Pack that while it changes the core gameplay to be more like Melee. It does not equal a separate game. Project M just makes Brawl better. And considering I still like Brawl the most out of the three official games, that's compliment enough. As it stands, Project M cannot exist without Brawl so it confuses me when people who like a competitive Smash Bros. more goes for Project M > Melee > Brawl when I consider Project M still a part of Brawl.

In addition, I love Project M more for the ability to add mods to the game without hacks (Different stages, costumes, and ability to change the music, etc) more so then I do for the more competitive aspect of the game.
 
Giga12 said:
)I think Smash Bros. should not be a competitive fighter, and am perfectly fine with Brawl's casual style.
Click to expand...
This is bullshit.

I'm fine with people being casual. I myself play the more "competitive way," but that doesn't mean I say the game shouldn't be played casually. Why deny the people who want to play competitively just because you don't like it?

Melee is a great example. It's very competitive but still can be played casually.
 
What I meant was, I prefer he series as a casual fighter. I'm perfectly fine with people playing competitively. I apologise if my wording was unclear.
 
Northern Verve said:
Not sure if this counts. But I don't consider Project M as a separate game from Brawl, the graphics, the extra stuff, are a main reason why. It's all-in-all a mod of Brawl that serves as an expansion Pack that while it changes the core gameplay to be more like Melee. It does not equal a separate game. Project M just makes Brawl better. And considering I still like Brawl the most out of the three official games, that's compliment enough. As it stands, Project M cannot exist without Brawl so it confuses me when people who like a competitive Smash Bros. more goes for Project M > Melee > Brawl when I consider Project M still a part of Brawl.

In addition, I love Project M more for the ability to add mods to the game without hacks (Different stages, costumes, and ability to change the music, etc) more so then I do for the more competitive aspect of the game.
Click to expand...

You're not alone on this, and Project M isn't known for the ability to customize as much as just simply modding your Brawl.

By the way, I think Brawl Minus is superior to Project M
 
Giga12 said:
What I meant was, I prefer he series as a casual fighter. I'm perfectly fine with people playing competitively. I apologise if my wording was unclear.
Click to expand...

just be warned that the ssb series is a fighting game franchise, and with that all fighting games are competitive.
 
1) I also don't like Final Destination.
2) I also disliked Snake's inclusion in Brawl.
3) I think Ike is way too overpowered and I think he desperately needs to be nerfed.
4) I hope Pokémon Trainer gets cut for Smash 4. I have nothing against him, but he's just too gimmicky.
5) I didn't like R.O.B.'s inclusion in Brawl, but I hope he returns for Smash 4.
6) I hope Waluigi and Toad are never playable in Super Smash Bros.

I'll keep posting.