Pokemon X and Pokemon Y

I hope there's not a new type. We're fine with the types we have now and we do not need a new type. Think of the huge gap it would create; it would look awful. 649 Pokémon wouldn't have the new type. To balance things out, at least half of the new Pokémon would have to be of the new type. If anything, they should make some changes to the type chart (make Poison super-effective against Water and Fighting and make Ice resistant to Dragon).
 
Maybe it will be.. the Pink-thing type

All cute pink pokemon will be pinkthing types from now on ::)
 
Anser said:
(make Poison super-effective against Water and Fighting and make Ice resistant to Dragon).

Those don't make any sense at all.
 
Poison being super-effective Water makes sense, but the other two not so much. Then again, it's never explained why Poison is resistant to Fighting and Dark is weak against Bug.
 
Looker said:
Poison being super-effective Water makes sense, but the other two not so much. Then again, it's never explained why Poison is resistant to Fighting and Dark is weak against Bug.

or why psychic is super effective against poison.


POISON IN YOUR WAY, USE YOUR MIND TO DESTROY IT
 
Mario4Ever said:
Anser said:
(make Poison super-effective against Water and Fighting and make Ice resistant to Dragon).

Those don't make any sense at all.

They do. Poison can pollute water and, like Ghostony said, Fighting usually represents shape/health, and Poison can ruin that. It's unfair that Poison is only super-effective against Grass, which is very commonly paired with Poison itself, nullifying the effect. Ice doesn't necessarily makes sense being resistant to Dragon, but it's in terms of balance. Ice is only resistand to itself, which is a little unfair. What would be better than making it resistant to the statistically most powerful type in the game?
 
what's with all this discussion about a new type? heesh, i don't want a new type - xerneas looks like a fighting/psychic or something like that to me