PaperStriker
I propose for the location going here.
*applauses*kat-rin koopa said:Not before they make a Bowser game. Why is it so hard for franchise owners to say "Hey, let's make a game of the villain"? We've already seen his potential for it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
*applauses*kat-rin koopa said:Not before they make a Bowser game. Why is it so hard for franchise owners to say "Hey, let's make a game of the villain"? We've already seen his potential for it.
Fix'd.PaperStriker said:*applauds*kat-rin koopa said:Not before they make a Bowser game. Why is it so hard for franchise owners to say "Hey, let's make a game of the villain"? We've already seen his potential for it.
Fix'dGarlic Man said:Fix'd.PaperStriker said:*applauds*kat-rin koopa said:Not before they make a Bowser game. Why is it so hard for franchise owners to say "Hey, let's make a game of the villain"? We've already seen his potential for it.
Also, about the game villain thing, remember Wario? Yeah, he was the villain in Mario Land 2. But in Mario Land 3(Which did HAVE mario in it) was all about Wario! Wario land! Ya! A game featuring the villain! Awesome!
I know. Cameos don't count, foo'.SmashBrother said:Fix'dGarlic Man said:Fix'd.PaperStriker said:*applauds*kat-rin koopa said:Not before they make a Bowser game. Why is it so hard for franchise owners to say "Hey, let's make a game of the villain"? We've already seen his potential for it.
Also, about the game villain thing, remember Wario? Yeah, he was the villain in Mario Land 2. But in Mario Land 3(Which didn't HAVE mario in it) was all about Wario! Wario land! Ya! A game featuring the villain! Awesome!
You're right, Mario wasn't in it!
Indeed. *glances at Wario's Woods*PhilibusterBeetle said:Yeah, Waluigi definitely needs his own game. Toad starred in his own game.
Car for...?reecer6 said:I voted yes But I don't think I'll play it if it comes out. And who is voting no?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
<--- I don't really car for: