Should Nintendo make more babies?

[Ultraluigi]

Nintendo has created lots of babies. And according to KingBooWarioSir, they just created Baby Waluigi. Would you like to see other baby versions of characters?

 

[Propeller Toad]

Well if it was Baby Toad, I would make an exception.

To be honest, I really wouldn't like to see more Baby characters. It was a perfect and original idea when they created Baby Mario and Baby Luigi; however, upon creating more of them made the idea seem so redundant. Also creating baby characters for the less important characters (such as Daisy and more recently Waluigi) really did do no justice as well as serve no purpose.

I'm fine with the original two babies; however, I really do not want to see the others unless it is a game related to Yoshi's Island. The other babies literally serve little to no purpose either way.

 

[Ultraluigi]

There were baby toads in Paper Mario. Baby Mario and Baby Luigi were good, Baby Peach was okay, Baby Wario and Baby DK were pushing it, Baby Daisy was a bad idea, but now this Baby Waluigi is the worst idea EVER. Creating a spinoff baby of a spinoff character? DUMB ALERT DUMB ALERT DUMB ALERT.

 

[Propeller Toad]

Baby Peach/DK/Wario were alright as they expressed their own abilities in Yoshi's Island DS; however, I just feel that they are unnecessary otherwise in the regular Mario series. Baby Peach served a bit of a role in M& L: PiT; but otherwise that was it.

Baby Daisy really took the matter a bit too far as there was no reason for her existence in a spin-off game. This was the true starting of where the babies began to become "hated". Baby Waluigi...let's not go there. Baby Mario and Baby Luigi were unique when they appear in the spin-offs as representatives of the Yoshi series; however, when more babies start to arrive they just destroy the unique feeling of the baby characters. Anyways, that is my thought.

As for Baby Toad, he could work. However, I guess that was just the arrogant feeling I had when I noticed Toad wasn't included in Yoshi's Island DS. :P

 

[Uniju]

No. As much as I'd like to see the next Mario Kart cut another couple veterans in favour of Baby Waluigi or Baby Bee Queen just for the laughs, no.

 

[Crackin355]

I don't know why but my first thought was "So he's asking if we think Nintendo should produce babies". Then i realized it was babies from the games.

Anyway, I think No. Baby mario & Luigi are fine, although I find them unoriginal, it's alright. baby Peach, not so much, the other babies no and baby daisy, no way in hell. For Yoshi's Island, Yes, for spin-off's, hell no.

 

[Dorayaki]

I honestly say please take care of Yoshi series future games before babies
so if not, talking about this is not meaningful sicne babies must rely on their game appearances

unless you just mean that you want to see commercial products just like Disney babies (baby Mickey club, baby princesses etc) :P

No. As much as I'd like to see the next Mario Kart cut another couple veterans in favour of Baby Waluigi or Baby Bee Queen just for the laughs, no.

firstly if some others mean spinoff appearances
the fact is the staff can't even deal with main characters' appearances, no other room for more babies

in a view that they are subseries characters, they can only vote for several representives to be in racing
basically only baby Mario bros and princesses can be secondary players among some games
unless you make rotation (ex. no baby Mario but baby Wario in Kart 10)

 

[Ultraluigi]

I honestly say please take care of Yoshi series future games before babies
so if not, talking about this is not meaningful sicne babies must rely on their game appearances

unless you just mean that you want to see commercial products just like Disney babies (baby Mickey club, baby princesses etc) :P

Why do you colour your text like that? You know you can just bold it, right?

I don't know why but my first thought was "So he's asking if we think Nintendo should produce babies". Then i realized it was babies from the games.

Anyway, I think No. Baby mario & Luigi are fine, although I find them unoriginal, it's alright. baby Peach, not so much, the other babies no and baby daisy, no way in hell. For Yoshi's Island, Yes, for spin-off's, hell no.

I meant create babies, not give birth to them.

 

[MnSG]

Simple answer: No

Only the following babies are good enough, especially since they are the 7 Star Children.

Baby Mario
Baby Luigi
Baby Peach
Baby DK
Baby Wario
Baby Bowser
Baby Yoshi

 

[Dorayaki]

Simple answer: No
Only the following babies are good enough, especially since they are the 7 Star Children.

basically I'm with that when plot need, then other babies appear, not for fans' idea or love

but if some other adult friends who were also childhood friend of them (ex, Daisy or DK's gang)
I don't think they shouldn't appear (in future Yoshi series) reasonably, just focus on that it's the fact of past

actually I was not happy about the "7 stars" since there was no criterion to exclude other babies

 

[Ultraluigi]

Simple answer: No

Only the following babies are good enough, especially since they are the 7 Star Children.

Baby Mario
Baby Luigi
Baby Peach
Baby DK
Baby Wario
Baby Bowser
Baby Yoshi

I think they should stick to those babies too. Anyway, forget what I said about Baby Waluigi, it was a hoax by some fan.