Muammar Gaddafi - Dead

Northern Verve said:
Marwikedor said:
I agree with that. People ask me who I hate more, Obamabush, or Hitler. I don't know! Hitler never did anything to me! That's like asking who do I hate more, Obamabush or Lex Luthor more!
Click to expand...

Eh... Hitler didn't do anything to you because he existed long before you were born. He however is one of the worst men in History to everyone. Just because you think he didn't do anything to the effect to you (Which is silly because had he won WWII unless you're (And your parents, and other family members) of German heritage and/or have Blond Hair and Blue Eyes chances are you wouldn't have even been born). Nothing Bush or Obama ever did should make them even considered as bad as Hitler.

And for one thing, Lex Luthor is a fictional character. OF COURSE he never did anything to you.
Click to expand...

Neo-Nazis don't hate him, and I find it deplorable that human society casts judgment on others simply because its members disagree with one another.
 
The blonde hair blue eye crap: Everything is true about that except the facts. Stalin was worse than Hitler. Hitler just wanted to fight the Soviet Union which killed far more and threatened the world with nucleur devestation for DECADES. To make a long story super-short, the Nazis came to power on the promise of overthrowing the diabolical Soviet empire and bringing Germany out of the depression. Poland could have allied with the Axis powers because as history came to show it sure was better off than under the Bolsheviks. But England basically makes the promise to Poland hey if Hitler attacks you we will fight on your side. But England thought the USSR and Nazi Germany would just duke it out. However, then the USSR and Germany sign a non-agression treaty which stuns the world because everyone thought the fascists and communists would come to blows from the very begining. Because Poland is enboldened due to Enlgand's promise, they don't ally with Germany. Then, lo and behold, Germany invades Poland and Russia flanks Poland from behind. They team up together! England is flabbergasted and doesn't know what to do. Regardless, England and France are at war with Germany within the week. Later on, hitler breaks the non-agression treaty and attacks Russia. The whole mess would have been avoided if we just would have let the Third Reich and the satanic Soviet Empire just go to war with eachother and destory each other. For the millionth time, Stalin was worse than Hitler. He killed 30 million of his own people. Fellow Communist chairman Moa of China killed 70 MILLION of his own people. The United States did NOT win WWII. It was a disaster. All of Eastern Europe was sold out to the evil beyond words USSR and results in a cold war with our former Russian allies from 1945-1990 DURING THAT TIME WE MAY WELL ALL HAVE BEEN KILLED IN NUCLUER WAR! But we didn't, and luck and luck alone (well prayer too) we have to thank for our sorry lives. Would this have happend if we just would have let Nazi Germany and the Soviet Empire kill each other and not get involved? No sir it would not have. England should have played their cards better to prevent the unessesary war.
 
Mario4Ever said:
Marwikedor said:
Dr. Javelin said:
Marwikedor said:
BOO! They shouldn't have killed him he will just be replaced with Moslem terrorist regime waaaay more extreme. He was a moderate! The United States NEEDS TO STOP RECKLESSLY SUPPORTING THESE STUPID REBELS IN THE ARAB WORLD WHEN THEY WILL BE FAR WORSE THAN OUR ALLIES THEY TOPPLE!!! GADAFFI WAS NOT A BAD GUY NEITHER WAS MUBAREK (SP?) STUPID AMERICA SPENDING MILLIONS TO AID IN THIS OPERATION WITH MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED HERE!!! GRRRRR!!!
Click to expand...
He wasn't a bad guy?

He ordered the Lockheed bombings, for your information. And he killed thousands of Libyan civilians.

I'd rather have a Islamic regime that is relatively peaceful than a madman who orders terrorist attacks. And even so, the rebel movement was not Islamic. I think.
Click to expand...
But the rebel scum is NOT a peaceful Islamic regime they are fanatical Islamic fundamentalists. don't you remember the nightmare of the Muslim Brotherhood taking over in neighboring Egypt?! Saddam Hussein in Iraq also didn't let terrorists in his country, Christians were as well off in Iraq under his rule (and Saddam's righthandman, Teriq Aziz, was a Catholic) NOW CHRISTIANS IN IRAQ ARE GETTING KILLED BECAUSE OF RETARD GEORGE BUSH! Bush was just a retard but Barack Obama is an evil man and he knows full well what he's doing.
Click to expand...

Why do you care so much about Christians in Iraq?
Click to expand...
Because they lived in peace and were not persecuted in Iraq (and even held positions of power. Remember Saddam's right-hand man?) but after Retard Bush invades Iraq and causes chaos, they are being killed today. And the Japanese attacked us because we cut off their oil. SHIGERU MIYAMOTO'S FATHER COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED BY THOSE ATOMIC BOMBS!!!
 
Marwikedor said:
Mario4Ever said:
Marwikedor said:
Dr. Javelin said:
Marwikedor said:
BOO! They shouldn't have killed him he will just be replaced with Moslem terrorist regime waaaay more extreme. He was a moderate! The United States NEEDS TO STOP RECKLESSLY SUPPORTING THESE STUPID REBELS IN THE ARAB WORLD WHEN THEY WILL BE FAR WORSE THAN OUR ALLIES THEY TOPPLE!!! GADAFFI WAS NOT A BAD GUY NEITHER WAS MUBAREK (SP?) STUPID AMERICA SPENDING MILLIONS TO AID IN THIS OPERATION WITH MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED HERE!!! GRRRRR!!!
Click to expand...
He wasn't a bad guy?

He ordered the Lockheed bombings, for your information. And he killed thousands of Libyan civilians.

I'd rather have a Islamic regime that is relatively peaceful than a madman who orders terrorist attacks. And even so, the rebel movement was not Islamic. I think.
Click to expand...
But the rebel scum is NOT a peaceful Islamic regime they are fanatical Islamic fundamentalists. don't you remember the nightmare of the Muslim Brotherhood taking over in neighboring Egypt?! Saddam Hussein in Iraq also didn't let terrorists in his country, Christians were as well off in Iraq under his rule (and Saddam's righthandman, Teriq Aziz, was a Catholic) NOW CHRISTIANS IN IRAQ ARE GETTING KILLED BECAUSE OF RETARD GEORGE BUSH! Bush was just a retard but Barack Obama is an evil man and he knows full well what he's doing.
Click to expand...

Why do you care so much about Christians in Iraq?
Click to expand...
Because they lived in peace and were not persecuted in Iraq (and even held positions of power. Remember Saddam's right-hand man?) but after Retard Bush invades Iraq and causes chaos, they are being killed today. And the Japanese attacked us because we cut off their oil. SHIGERU MIYAMOTO'S FATHER COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED BY THOSE ATOMIC BOMBS!!!
Click to expand...

We are not here to talk about Miyamoto.
 
I think England made the right
choice, anyway why the hell are we talking about WWII when we should be talking about Muammar Gaddafi
 
SuperMario25 said:
I think England made the right
choice, anyway why the hell are we talking about WWII when we should be talking about Muammar Gaddafi
Click to expand...
Because he should not have been killed. While the lesser of two evils may still be evil (like how hitler was the lesser of two evils by far when compared with stalin and the Red Flag of Communism), we should still back the lesser of two evils especially when Christians aren't being killed.
 
Marwikedor said:
The blonde hair blue eye crap: Everything is true about that except the facts. Stalin was worse than Hitler. Hitler just wanted to fight the Soviet Union which killed far more and threatened the world with nucleur devestation for DECADES. To make a long story super-short, the Nazis came to power on the promise of overthrowing the diabolical Soviet empire and bringing Germany out of the depression. Poland could have allied with the Axis powers because as history came to show it sure was better off than under the Bolsheviks. But England basically makes the promise to Poland hey if Hitler attacks you we will fight on your side. But England thought the USSR and Nazi Germany would just duke it out. However, then the USSR and Germany sign a non-agression treaty which stuns the world because everyone thought the fascists and communists would come to blows from the very begining. Because Poland is enboldened due to Enlgand's promise, they don't ally with Germany. Then, lo and behold, Germany invades Poland and Russia flanks Poland from behind. They team up together! England is flabbergasted and doesn't know what to do. Regardless, England and France are at war with Germany within the week. Later on, hitler breaks the non-agression treaty and attacks Russia. The whole mess would have been avoided if we just would have let the Third Reich and the satanic Soviet Empire just go to war with eachother and destory each other. For the millionth time, Stalin was worse than Hitler. He killed 30 million of his own people. Fellow Communist chairman Moa of China killed 70 MILLION of his own people. The United States did NOT win WWII. It was a disaster. All of Eastern Europe was sold out to the evil beyond words USSR and results in a cold war with our former Russian allies from 1945-1990 DURING THAT TIME WE MAY WELL ALL HAVE BEEN KILLED IN NUCLUER WAR! But we didn't, and luck and luck alone (well prayer too) we have to thank for our sorry lives. Would this have happend if we just would have let Nazi Germany and the Soviet Empire kill each other and not get involved? No sir it would not have. England should have played their cards better to prevent the unessesary war.
Click to expand...

Damn it, more people need to realize that Satanism has nothing to do with this deplorable sort of shit. If you knew a thing about Satanism, you'd know that the USSR definitely was not Satanic. I just hate it when people bash something without understanding it (which you did indirectly) just because societal tradition has forced that into their brains, but fuck it, this is a thread about Gadhafi. I thought the U.S. was done with the whole "Saviors of the World" thing years ago. We wouldn't be hated so much if the population was smart enough to elect officials who would focus on managing our problems instead of trying to "democratize" everyone else.