Honestly, I don't think either artwork is OoC for her. The former is just her smiling a little. She's not that giddy. And the latter, as people have said, was intended to be serious and stoic rather than arrogant and smug, though I can see why people could read the latter from her expression...
He said like a goddess.
Still wonder how she can survive for centuries though.
What's wrong with her letting loose a little though? Otherwise, it feels like you're shaming her body. It's also understandable why she has to wear a tennis outfit and shoes (maneuverability) and a swimsuit/leotard...
How exactly does a one-piece swimsuit mean Rosalina has lost all her character and turned into a blatant sex object?
By that logic, Peach and Daisy have as well.
Even Sticker Star had that.
Well, Emily Rogers was apparently at least once a Treehouse member, and might still be one.
Anyway, here's more from him.
(In response to "Are there original characters?")
Really sounds too good to be true. Who knows, though? It might happen (Although I agree...
Admittedly SPM was.
I saw this quote from a GameFAQs user who claims to be a Treehouse member. While the legitimacy is obviously questionable, so is the existence of the Paper Mario game to begin with.
Look, I don't mean to be rude, but really, guys? I'm gonna have to side with Magikrazy. This isn't the early 1900s anymore. Shoulders and thighs haven't been considered scandalous for almost a century.
All of Rosalina's outfits are quite modest to begin with. Yet people find a way to make them...
Quite possibly the only times we've ever seen Mario shirtless? I'd expect him to be...hairier.
Back on topic, I don't think Rosalina's tennis outfit or swimsuit are inappropriate at all. It's just a few fanboys objectifying her, and that happens with almost any fictional character.