Super Mario Rescues The Princess - Seth MacFarlane's Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy

[ralphfan]

This is so fucking funny.

 

[Lario]

That's kind of old, though.

I'd say it's one of his better animations, anyway.

 

[ralphfan]

The star part is by far the best.

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

It's lame, unfunny, dry humour.

 

[ralphfan]

Well, what do you consider funny?

And yes, I guess slapstick is just as funny.

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

Well, what do you consider funny?

And yes, I guess slapstick is just as funny.

Seinfeld, slice-of-life anime, basically anything that's not gross humor. ._.

Yeah, it can be funny the first time if it's done right, but when you know what's gonna happen.

 

[ralphfan]

Seinfeld is funny. I love the anti-dentite dialogue. Ugo: Weeaboos don't make sense to me, so don't try.

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

*facepalm*

You don't know what the slice-of-life genre is?

It's not even anime. ._.

 

[Lario]

Well, you like it when it's anime...

 

[Nerdy Guy]

I don't really like the skit. I think it's done in very poor taste and an overly long take on a cliché joke.

 

[ralphfan]

Seth MacFarlane does the world's best cutaway scenes that don't even relate to the show.

 

[wsbm]

Why hasn’t Nintendo sued yet?

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

Because no lawyer would take the case because Nintendo would win and then they'd have to pay lawyer fees.

 

[ralphfan]

I don't think Nintendo's too offended.

 

[Nerdy Guy]

I know I would if I worked for NOA, but you can't really sue Seth because of free speech and stuff. Suing him would be like just suing an immature "fan"work, and Nintendo doesn't waste their time trying to sue everyone.

 

[Uniju]

Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy isn't making any money, is it?
If it isn't making any money, I'm pretty sure it's 100% fine and if Nintendo sued him they would lose.

 

[ralphfan]

I don't think Nintendo needs more money.

 

[Aiko Heiwa]

Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy isn't making any money, is it?
If it isn't making any money, I'm pretty sure it's 100% fine and if Nintendo sued him they would lose.

I think they released it onto DVD. :\

 

[Uniju]

Well in that case Nintendo may be able to sue them, but I doubt they would. It's not really worth it to go after every single such instance.

 

[ralphfan]

Totally true.

 

[Glowsquid]

Parody is protected under the First Amendment, so even if Nintendo cared, they couldn't sue.

 

[ralphfan]

People have threatened to sue Weird Al over stuff.

 

[Nerdy Guy]

Those were for things like "Did I permit him to do this?" and other reasons, Ralph. :P

 

[ralphfan]

But if it covers parody...