Things in the Mario series that made you upset/disappointed

Going further into the whole plot vs. pacing thing:

To some this might come as a surprise, but you can actually tell a story without bringing the gameplay to a screeching halt. There are other ways to convey a plot than through walls of text and cutscenes.

A skilled story-writer would be able to build a coherent narrative through the way the game environments are designed alone.

Subtlety is the key.
 
Gabumon said:
I'm not actually in favor of adding a plot to the Mario platformers. I'm just saying that Zelda is a series with very stern game mechanics that have been firmly set in stone (collect McGuffins to get the better sword to kill the bad guy), while Mario is a series with very stern principles that have been firmly set in stone (go through levels and jump on things until you reach the bad guy). They're not THAT different. So saying doing something for one of them is fine, but for the other it will never ever work is kind of silly.

Actually, King Antasma is mentioning a pretty fine example up there: Super Mario Galaxy. Not only does that game have probably the most well-defined Mario character ever, it also has the Toad Brigade, which are actually surprisingly coherent characters for Mario standards. Nowhere in that game do these story elements (yes, developed characters are story elements) bog down the game experience. And it just so happens that Super Mario Galaxy is one of the most critically acclaimed Mario titles of all time.

So your notion that all story elements, no matter how skillfully and with how much care to preserve the game's pacing they are implemented, will inherently "*bleep* with the game"... I call bull*bleep* on it.

That said, I've accepted the Mario Platformers' refusal to do anything new anymore. I don't care if they add whatever to the games. This point I raise just for the principle of the matter.



But to get into something I wanted to mention before all of this popped up: I just thought maybe having a different villain for a platformer might not actually be such a bad idea after all.

...but only under the condition that Bowser is playable (Mario is still the default character though, so the players don't get scared by too much new content). Imagine the novelty of being able to play as Bowser in a main series platformer. If advertised decently, it might evoke enough of a WTF factor that it would probably sell really well.
Click to expand...
No, its not even remotely silly to say that, Zelda is an entirely different genre with entirely different set ups not to mention being a naturally slower and methodical type of game, thus story elements being more appropriate.


Super Mario Galaxy barely has any plot in it. Its Bowser steals peach and grand stars to build his own galaxy to conquer the universe, everything else was largely superfluous, even the toad brigade mainly just existed to provide assistance in the levels themselves.

Other than Rosalina's backstory, an element that again was largely irrelevant, it really had nothing more than any other Mario excuse plot.
 
Mcmadness said:
Other than Rosalina's backstory, an element that again was largely irrelevant, it really had nothing more than any other Mario excuse plot.
Click to expand...

"Other than the things it had more than any other Mario excuse plot, it really had nothing more than any other Mario excuse plot"

You have thoroughly bested me. Congratulations.

I have provided you with ample means of how decent storytelling COULD be applied to a game with Mario's type of pacing. Your refusal to acknowledge any of them I am going to interpret as you not having anything to counter them.

If you do have appropriate counter material for them, then please tell me how storytelling mechanisms that do not impact pacing at all would "fuck with the game".
 
You mean the non obligatory side story that has absolutely zero to do with the actual main events of the game and that most people hated because it was utterly dull?

Oh yeah, that was real great.
 
Gabumon said:
Going further into the whole plot vs. pacing thing:

To some this might come as a surprise, but you can actually tell a story without bringing the gameplay to a screeching halt. There are other ways to convey a plot than through walls of text and cutscenes.

A skilled story-writer would be able to build a coherent narrative through the way the game environments are designed alone.

Subtlety is the key.
Click to expand...

I have no interest in debating with an opponent who does not bother to read what I write.
 
Mcmadness said:
Super Mario Galaxy barely has any plot in it. Its Bowser steals peach and grand stars to build his own galaxy to conquer the universe, everything else was largely superfluous, even the toad brigade mainly just existed to provide assistance in the levels themselves.

Other than Rosalina's backstory, an element that again was largely irrelevant, it really had nothing more than any other Mario excuse plot.
Click to expand...
They could build on to that.

I know for a fact that Nintendo can create a good story. Simple as that. Using this knowledge, I also know that the company has enough experience to subtly hide the well-done story in the fast paced matter of the platformers.

Edo has given enough proof, and I'm planning on doing so when I'm not tired, but if you're just going to shoot it down and not give enough valid reasons, I'm just going to quit trying.
 
Yeah, I don't even need to counter that because it forgets one of the well known facts about this franchise.


MARIO IS NOT SUBTLE

It deals with extremely obvious plot points and in your face cartoonish characters.

Hell even fucking Rosalina's goddamn back story is presented as a literal story that she bloody reads to you.

Fuck, in the beginning of 3D World Bowser literally holds the captured sprixie to the viewers to emphasise the fact that he just captured her.

I get what your saying, and with other series that line of thinking would most definitely work but in Mario's case pretty much everything it does is inservice of the gameplay, the random npcs, locations, level designs, all of it.
 
I know Mario is not subtle.

But the presence of in-your-face type of elements and subtleness are not mutually exclusive. Mario can be pretty subtle when it wants to be. There are things like ghosts that only appear if you stand around in a certain spot for an unintuitive amount of time. There are strange shadowy figures hidden in sky textures. There are objects like books hidden inside walls where you need to manipulate the camera in order to see them.

Mario is direct and cartoony, yes, but it does have its nuances too. Little secrets that are irrelevant for the main plot, but still exist. And people absolutely love it. They are all over that shit. Why are these figures up there in the sky? Why are they called Hell Valley Sky Trees? What does it mean? People are wrapping their heads around these things, trying to figure out what they're about.

It adds a layer of mystery and wonder to the games. And for players who enjoy such things, these little nuances hidden behind the facade of hamfisted cartooniness will stick with them far, FAR beyond the end credits. Fuck, it's been about 15 years since I played Banjo Kazooie for the first time and even though I know now I STILL remember how much that damn ice key puzzled me.

And this is the true beauty of subtle story elements. They give your game, Mario or not, something beyond its mechanics and provide your audience with something they can remember it by fondly.

To claim these things have no place in Mario games is ignorant, because they already exist within them.

To claim these things do not add anything to the experience is absurd, because proof to the contrary is all around you, provided by passionate and occasionally crazy game theorists.

And to claim that these things are actively detrimental to the Mario series... is madness.
 
....I was never talking about any of that.

I mean actual main plot points, just side fluff that gives things extra fluff. I mean an actual main over arching plotline that goes beyond just the usual excuse plot shit the series normally has.

That is what I feel is detrimental, irrelevant side shit is fine, but the main plot has to remain basic or the flow would be destroyed. Subtle elements can only go so far in telling a story, it needs more up front and in your face methods as well like cutscenes dialogue, character interaction, etc etc. and its those in your face story methods that would cause a negative impact on the gameplay.
 
Mcmadness said:
it needs more up front and in your face methods as well like cutscenes dialogue, character interaction, etc etc.
Click to expand...

I think we have found the quintessential point where our opinions differ.

Again, a skilled writer can convey narrative through media other than cutscienes or mandatory dialogue.

I believe to truly understand the full potential of storytelling, you must stop thinking of story as a segmented complex of "main plot and useless side shit" and view it as an actual, organic whole. A game's story is the combination of all it's story elements, including the main plot AND the "little side fluff". A well-crafted story is one experience. One experience that transcends the sum of its individual parts.

Mario's basic hamfist plot and subtle story elements forming a coherent narrative on the side CAN come together and form a well-rounded story experience that complements the game WITHOUT slowing it down even a bit. It is not impossible, I am absolutely sure of it.

They just have to be willing to try. Which they don't need to because Mario sells like crazy regardless of what they do. So nothing will ever happen.
 
Well, the fact that the more average players of this series don't seem to care about that probably doesn't help.

And I view them as separate parts because thats what they are and in Mario's case that is always how its presented, Rosalina's story is the most plot centered thing ever in a Mario platformer and it is positively 100% irrelevant to the actual major events of the game. It was specifically designed to be that way and thats how it should be.

Keep it simple and minimlistic, the real ''story'' is the experience of the levels themselves, not its narrative elements, no matter how their presented.
 
King Antasma said:
Seto Kaiba said:
I am dissappointed that there has not been a game yet with Mario and Bowser dating.
Click to expand...
uh...wat
Click to expand...
Exactly what I said.

Sherlock Holmes said:
Seto Kaiba said:
I am dissappointed that there has not been a game yet with Mario and Bowser dating.
Click to expand...
best post itt
Click to expand...
ty!
 
That manner of thinking that everything is separate and disconnected strikes me as reminiscent of a person leaving their house to walk to the bus stop. On their way they find a dollar on the ground, but they refuse to pick it up because it is not essential to the main plot of getting to the bus. It's an awkward way of thinking and perception doesn't really work that way.

But you don't really strike me as a person who is particularly invested in storytelling. That's not a bad thing, it just explains why acquiring a basic understanding of story as one organic entity appears like an insignificant undertaking to you.

Anyway, now that we've come to the core of our disagreement, there's little point in going on. Neither of us is going to change the others' opinion on the matter of how storytelling works, so at this point we might as well return to the original point of the thread.



I was very disappointed by the final battle of Super Mario Sunshine. I'm not really sure what exactly it was I expected back then, I only remember seething disappointment.
 
I can actually get very invested in stories, but the ones in Mario have never really been all that great for me so when it comes to Mario platformers I'm of the uninterested sort.


Still we are at opposite crossroads here so........shake?
 
I am not actually mad at you or anything. Mario platformer stories would be a ridiculous subject to form grudges over, ha ha.

I know the way I formulate my posts sometimes comes across as fierce and condescending, but I don't mean anything personal with it. So don't worry about it, everything is fine.

Plus, I don't really want to dislike you. I like your signature too much for that.
 
The written part or the gif?
 
The gif. I like Bowser's interaction with his son. It's kind of cute.

The written part is nice too. I think it's an Earthbound reference, or it might be from Mother 3. My memory is kind of foggy.
 
Mother 3 to be specific, just take the n off of sign.


And yes I do love the character interaction, I maybe opposed to a larger emphasis on a storyline but characters interacting and showing personality is A-ok with me.

Like Luigi's mansion dark moon, simple basic story but plenty of amusing interactions between the characters.
 
King Antasma said:
Donatello said:
There needs to be more mainstream villains than Bowser.

Give the whole Bowser kidnapping the princess thong a rest already.
Click to expand...
THIS so much. I wish they could bring back the old villains Wart and Tatanga, and some of the RPG villains as well. (Especially Fawful, Dimentio and Antasma)

If there was ever a main game where all those villains teamed up, oh man would I love that.

But nay, it seems like it will forever be Bowser kidnapping someone, because you know, "LEL NO STORY"
Click to expand...
That would be cool and all the villains hang around in a secret lair and will sit near a long table and make plans and other malicious doings.

Yes, wasted opportunities is a big issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back