Wolverine said:
itt: i prove ways how wikipedia shouldnt be cited and others back me up while others get mad at me for some reason
Wikipedia said:
We advise special caution when using Wikipedia as a source for research projects. Normal academic usage of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias is for getting the general facts of a problem and to gather keywords, references and bibliographical pointers, but not as a source in itself. Remember that Wikipedia is a wiki, which means that anyone in the world can edit an article, deleting accurate information or adding false information, which the reader may not recognize.
You don't even read, do you?
And besides, don't let teachers do the thinking for you. I don't listen to teachers that tell me to "never" use Wikipedia. I won't use Wikipedia as a source for any formal arguments, but it's still a good way to go to make quick points and fact-checks. Schools, especially dumb old teachers,
are capable of teaching students total screed, so critical thinking is essential.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to robots this generation. If that means they can save lives quicker and more accurately (like the semi-robot surgeon, or the EMILY lifesaver), then I'm all for them. Robots are growing, and they will advance our society for the benefit of many, many people.