Logic game

tardograd2

tardograd2

Cheep Cheep
So, what you do is you take the conclusion from the above post, and take it as a premise alongside another premise, and use a syllogism to provea new conclusion.

SEED CONCLUSION:
It is raining
 
(The explanation is hard to interpret but I'll do what I think you mean)

It is raining and a dog walks inside.

Conclusion: There's a wet dog in your house
 
There is a wet dog in your house
There is not a wet dog in your house
Therefore, George Washington is made of rakes
 
George Washington is made of rakes
George Washington walked on a carpet once
Therefore, Bethesda was actually on to something when they designed an AI system that makes old ladies rake their carpets.
 
Prince Raid said:
George Washington is made of rakes
George Washington walked on a carpet once
Therefore, Bethesda was actually on to something when they designed an AI system that makes old ladies rake their carpets.
Click to expand...
That isn't valid logic.
 
tardograd2 said:
There is a wet dog in your house
There is not a wet dog in your house
Therefore, George Washington is made of rakes
Click to expand...
And this is?
 
Duskull said:
tardograd2 said:
There is a wet dog in your house
There is not a wet dog in your house
Therefore, George Washington is made of rakes
Click to expand...
And this is?
Click to expand...
From contradiction, anything follows
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back